Tyrone F Borders1, Brenda M Booth. 1. Department of Health Policy and Management, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, USA. tfborders@uams.edu
Abstract
CONTEXT: Alcohol consumption is a major public health problem nationally, but little research has investigated drinking patterns by rurality of residence. PURPOSE: To describe the prevalence of abstinence, alcohol use disorders, and risky drinking in rural, suburban, and urban areas of the United States. METHODS: Analyses of the 2001-2002 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) were conducted to estimate prevalence rates for abstinence, a current alcohol use disorder, and exceeding recommended daily and weekly drinking limits. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to test for rural and urban versus suburban differences after adjusting for potential confounders. Additional analyses were stratified by Census Region. FINDINGS: Nationally, the odds of abstinence and, among drinkers, the odds of a current alcohol disorder and exceeding daily limits were higher in rural than suburban areas. Stratified analyses revealed differences in the associations between rurality of residence and drinking across Census Regions. Rural residents of the Northeast, Midwest, and South and urban residents of the Northeast had higher odds of abstinence than their suburban peers. Among drinkers, rural and urban residents of the Midwest had higher odds of a current alcohol disorder and exceeding daily limits; urban residents of the Midwest had higher odds of exceeding weekly limits. CONCLUSIONS: Abstinence is particularly common in the rural South, whereas alcohol disorders and excessive drinking are more problematic in the urban and rural Midwest. Health policies and interventions should be further targeted toward those places with higher risks of problem drinking.
CONTEXT: Alcohol consumption is a major public health problem nationally, but little research has investigated drinking patterns by rurality of residence. PURPOSE: To describe the prevalence of abstinence, alcohol use disorders, and risky drinking in rural, suburban, and urban areas of the United States. METHODS: Analyses of the 2001-2002 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) were conducted to estimate prevalence rates for abstinence, a current alcohol use disorder, and exceeding recommended daily and weekly drinking limits. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to test for rural and urban versus suburban differences after adjusting for potential confounders. Additional analyses were stratified by Census Region. FINDINGS: Nationally, the odds of abstinence and, among drinkers, the odds of a current alcohol disorder and exceeding daily limits were higher in rural than suburban areas. Stratified analyses revealed differences in the associations between rurality of residence and drinking across Census Regions. Rural residents of the Northeast, Midwest, and South and urban residents of the Northeast had higher odds of abstinence than their suburban peers. Among drinkers, rural and urban residents of the Midwest had higher odds of a current alcohol disorder and exceeding daily limits; urban residents of the Midwest had higher odds of exceeding weekly limits. CONCLUSIONS: Abstinence is particularly common in the rural South, whereas alcohol disorders and excessive drinking are more problematic in the urban and rural Midwest. Health policies and interventions should be further targeted toward those places with higher risks of problem drinking.
Authors: Melinda M Davis; Margaret Spurlock; Kristen Dulacki; Thomas Meath; Hsin-Fang Grace Li; Dennis McCarty; Donald Warne; Bill Wright; K John McConnell Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Karen J Derefinko; Zoran Bursac; Michael G Mejia; Richard Milich; Donald R Lynam Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: Kathryn E Weaver; Nynikka Palmer; Lingyi Lu; L Douglas Case; Ann M Geiger Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 2.506