BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy, although uncommonly performed, may be considered in patients who have renal anomalies, are poorly compliant, and have a large single renal-pelvic calculus. We present our experience with this procedure in five patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three patients underwent laparoscopic pyelolithotomy because of a horseshoe kidney, one for a pelvic kidney, and one for a large renal-pelvic calculus. All stones were solitary with a mean size of 2280 mm2 (range 540-8200 mm2). All were approached transperitoneally with passage of a flexible cystoscope through a laparoscopic port to aid in stone extraction. RESULTS: All cases were completed laparoscopically. The length of surgery was 74, 92, 134, 158, and 159 minutes. There were no minor or major complications, and the estimated blood loss was <50 mL in all cases. All patients were discharged on postoperative day 1 with the drains removed. Four patients were stented for 4 to 6 weeks. The remaining patient was not stented because of poor compliance. The stents were removed with office cystoscopy. All patients were stone free on follow-up imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy can be done safely, effectively, and efficiently with proper patient selection and adherence to standard laparoscopic surgical principles.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy, although uncommonly performed, may be considered in patients who have renal anomalies, are poorly compliant, and have a large single renal-pelvic calculus. We present our experience with this procedure in five patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three patients underwent laparoscopic pyelolithotomy because of a horseshoe kidney, one for a pelvic kidney, and one for a large renal-pelvic calculus. All stones were solitary with a mean size of 2280 mm2 (range 540-8200 mm2). All were approached transperitoneally with passage of a flexible cystoscope through a laparoscopic port to aid in stone extraction. RESULTS: All cases were completed laparoscopically. The length of surgery was 74, 92, 134, 158, and 159 minutes. There were no minor or major complications, and the estimated blood loss was <50 mL in all cases. All patients were discharged on postoperative day 1 with the drains removed. Four patients were stented for 4 to 6 weeks. The remaining patient was not stented because of poor compliance. The stents were removed with office cystoscopy. All patients were stone free on follow-up imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy can be done safely, effectively, and efficiently with proper patient selection and adherence to standard laparoscopic surgical principles.