Literature DB >> 17855587

Spatial interaction between spectral integration and frequency gradient in primary auditory cortex.

Kazuo Imaizumi1, Christoph E Schreiner.   

Abstract

Primary sensory cortical areas are characterized by orderly and largely independent representations of several receptive field properties. This is expressed in multiple, spatially overlaying parameter distributions, such as orientation preference, spatial frequency, and ocular dominance maps in the primary visual cortex. In the auditory cortex, two main and presumably independent representational parameters are the center frequency and the frequency extent of spectral tuning curves. Here we demonstrate interactions between cortical tonotopic gradient and spectral bandwidth modules in cat primary auditory cortex (AI). First, the spatial representation of spectral integration is not equally expressed across the whole frequency range in AI. Narrow-bandwidth modules are found only in the mid-frequency region (5-20 kHz). Thus spectral integration properties delineate three frequency regions (<5, 5-20, and >20 kHz) in cat AI. Second, the extent of spectral integration covaries with the local tonotopic gradient in the low- and mid-frequency ranges. Regions with a shallow frequency gradient tend to have narrower spectral integration than those with a steep gradient. These relationships between spectral selectivity and frequency gradient constrain forebrain models of thalamo- and corticocortical convergence and connectivity and may reflect the processing of behaviorally relevant stimulus constellations.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17855587     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00511.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  17 in total

1.  Spectral integration in primary auditory cortex attributable to temporally precise convergence of thalamocortical and intracortical input.

Authors:  Max F K Happel; Marcus Jeschke; Frank W Ohl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Auditory cortex mapmaking: principles, projections, and plasticity.

Authors:  Christoph E Schreiner; Jeffery A Winer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Auditory cortical local subnetworks are characterized by sharply synchronous activity.

Authors:  Craig A Atencio; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Laminar diversity of dynamic sound processing in cat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Craig A Atencio; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Spatial organization of repetition rate processing in cat anterior auditory field.

Authors:  Kazuo Imaizumi; Nicholas J Priebe; Steven W Cheung; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Primary auditory cortical responses to electrical stimulation of the thalamus.

Authors:  Craig A Atencio; Jonathan Y Shih; Christoph E Schreiner; Steven W Cheung
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Multidimensional receptive field processing by cat primary auditory cortical neurons.

Authors:  Craig A Atencio; Tatyana O Sharpee
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Columnar connectivity and laminar processing in cat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Craig A Atencio; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Encoding of temporal information by timing, rate, and place in cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Kazuo Imaizumi; Nicholas J Priebe; Tatyana O Sharpee; Steven W Cheung; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A map of periodicity orthogonal to frequency representation in the cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Gerald Langner; Hubert R Dinse; Ben Godde
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.