Literature DB >> 17855023

Three divergent mitochondrial genomes from California populations of the copepod Tigriopus californicus.

Ronald S Burton1, Rosemary J Byrne, Paul D Rawson.   

Abstract

Previous work on the harpacticoid copepod Tigriopus californicus has focused on the extensive population differentiation in three mtDNA protein coding genes (COXI, COXII, Cytb). In order to get a more complete understanding of mtDNA evolution in this species, we sequenced three complete mitochondrial genomes (one from each of three California populations) and compared them to two published mtDNA genomes from an Asian congener, Tigriopus japonicus. Several features of the mtDNA genome appear to be conserved within the genus: 1) the unique order of the protein coding genes, rRNA genes and most of the tRNA genes, 2) the genome is compact, varying between 14.3 and 14.6 kb, and 3) all genes are encoded on the same strand of the mtDNA. Within T. californicus, extremely high levels of nucleotide divergence (>20%) are observed across much of the mitochondrial genome. Inferred amino acid sequences of the proteins encoded in the mtDNAs also show high levels of divergence; at the extreme, the three ND3 variants in T. californicus showed >25% amino acid substitutions, compared with <3% amino acid divergence at the previously studied COXI locus. Unusual secondary structures make functional assignments of some tRNAs difficult. The only apparent tRNA(trp) in these genomes completely overlaps the 5' end of the 16S rRNA in all three T. californicus mtDNAs. Although not previously noted, this feature is also conserved in T. japonicus mtDNAs; whether this sequence is processed into a functional tRNA has not been determined. The putative control region contains a duplicated segment of different length (from 88 to 155 bp) in each of the T. californicus sequences. In each case, the duplicated segments are not tandem repeats; despite their different lengths, the distance between the start of the first and the start of the second repeat is conserved (520 bp). The functional significance, if any, of this repeat structure remains unknown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17855023     DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2007.07.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  18 in total

1.  Genotype-dependent variation of mitochondrial transcriptional profiles in interpopulation hybrids.

Authors:  Christopher K Ellison; Ronald S Burton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Faraway, so close. The comparative method and the potential of non-model animals in mitochondrial research.

Authors:  Liliana Milani; Fabrizio Ghiselli
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Elevated oxidative damage is correlated with reduced fitness in interpopulation hybrids of a marine copepod.

Authors:  Felipe S Barreto; Ronald S Burton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Quantifying the elevation of mitochondrial DNA evolutionary substitution rates over nuclear rates in the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus.

Authors:  Christopher S Willett
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  The mitochondrial genome sequence of Mus terricolor: comparison with Mus musculus domesticus and implications for xenomitochondrial mouse modeling.

Authors:  Wendy K Pogozelski; Leah D Fletcher; Carolyn A Cassar; David A Dunn; Ian A Trounce; Carl A Pinkert
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 3.688

6.  Distinctive mitochondrial genome of Calanoid copepod Calanus sinicus with multiple large non-coding regions and reshuffled gene order: useful molecular markers for phylogenetic and population studies.

Authors:  Wang Minxiao; Sun Song; Li Chaolun; Shen Xin
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Observing copepods through a genomic lens.

Authors:  James E Bron; Dagmar Frisch; Erica Goetze; Stewart C Johnson; Carol Eunmi Lee; Grace A Wyngaard
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  Genomic resources for sea lice: analysis of ESTs and mitochondrial genomes.

Authors:  Motoshige Yasuike; Jong Leong; Stuart G Jantzen; Kristian R von Schalburg; Frank Nilsen; Simon R M Jones; Ben F Koop
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 3.619

9.  In vivo quantification reveals extensive natural variation in mitochondrial form and function in Caenorhabditis briggsae.

Authors:  Kiley A Hicks; Dana K Howe; Aubrey Leung; Dee R Denver; Suzanne Estes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Massive gene rearrangement in mitogenomes of phytoseiid mites.

Authors:  Bo Zhang; Justin C Havird; Endong Wang; Jiale Lv; Xuenong Xu
Journal:  Int J Biol Macromol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 8.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.