OBJECTIVES: This study compares the prevalence of Mantoux positivity among prisoners in NSW in 1996 and 2001 and examines factors associated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. DESIGN: Cross-sectional random samples of prisoners, including a longitudinal cohort of prisoners screened in both 1996 and 2001. SETTING: 29 correctional centres. PARTICIPANTS: 747 men and 167 women participated in the 2001 NSW Inmate Health Survey; a cohort of 104 prisoners from the 1996 and 2001 NSW Inmate Health Surveys. RESULTS: The prevalence of Mantoux positivity remained stable between 1996 and 2001 (12% and 14%, p = 0.2), and increased among prisoners from Asian backgrounds (21% and 47%, p = 0.02). The annual risk of infection in the cohort among those detained continuously between 1996 and 2001 was 3.1%, and among recidivists it was 2.7% (p = 0.6). CONCLUSION: The risk of M. tuberculosis infection for Australian prisoners is assessed to be approximately four times higher than that for the community, however there is no attributable risk to the prison environment itself.
OBJECTIVES: This study compares the prevalence of Mantoux positivity among prisoners in NSW in 1996 and 2001 and examines factors associated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. DESIGN: Cross-sectional random samples of prisoners, including a longitudinal cohort of prisoners screened in both 1996 and 2001. SETTING: 29 correctional centres. PARTICIPANTS: 747 men and 167 women participated in the 2001 NSW Inmate Health Survey; a cohort of 104 prisoners from the 1996 and 2001 NSW Inmate Health Surveys. RESULTS: The prevalence of Mantoux positivity remained stable between 1996 and 2001 (12% and 14%, p = 0.2), and increased among prisoners from Asian backgrounds (21% and 47%, p = 0.02). The annual risk of infection in the cohort among those detained continuously between 1996 and 2001 was 3.1%, and among recidivists it was 2.7% (p = 0.6). CONCLUSION: The risk of M. tuberculosis infection for Australian prisoners is assessed to be approximately four times higher than that for the community, however there is no attributable risk to the prison environment itself.
Authors: Olivia Cords; Leonardo Martinez; Joshua L Warren; Jamieson Michael O'Marr; Katharine S Walter; Ted Cohen; Jimmy Zheng; Albert I Ko; Julio Croda; Jason R Andrews Journal: Lancet Public Health Date: 2021-03-22
Authors: Pedro Daibert de Navarro; Isabela Neves de Almeida; Afrânio Lineu Kritski; Maria das Graças Ceccato; Mônica Maria Delgado Maciel; Wânia da Silva Carvalho; Silvana Spindola de Miranda Journal: J Bras Pneumol Date: 2016 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.624
Authors: Natalie V S Vinkeles Melchers; Sabine L van Elsland; Joep M A Lange; Martien W Borgdorff; Jan van den Hombergh Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 3.240