Literature DB >> 17854279

On phrase structure and brain responses: a comment on Bahlmann, Gunter, and Friederici (2006).

Michael C Corballis1.   

Abstract

Bahlmann et al. (2006) reported an experiment on event-related brain potentials of sequences of syllables obeying two rules, one defined by A(n)B(n) and the other by (AB)(n), where the As and Bs are different classes of syllables. They interpreted their findings on the assumption that A(n)B(n) are parsed according a center-embedded phrase-structure grammar. In fact, such sequences are much more likely to be parsed in terms of the repetition of element types, without reference to phrase structure. This raises a general issue about attempting to study syntactic processing independently of semantics.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17854279     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.10.1581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  3 in total

Review 1.  The redundancy of recursion and infinity for natural language.

Authors:  Erkki Luuk; Hendrik Luuk
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-07-23

2.  Simple rules can explain discrimination of putative recursive syntactic structures by a songbird species.

Authors:  Caroline A A van Heijningen; Jos de Visser; Willem Zuidema; Carel ten Cate
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: an overview.

Authors:  W Tecumseh Fitch; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.