Literature DB >> 17853985

Sex in the morning or in the evening? Females adjust daily mating patterns to the intensity of sexual harassment.

Hanne Løvlie1, Tommaso Pizzari.   

Abstract

Selection on males to mate at a higher rate than females often results in male harassment of females and counteracting female responses. When the reproductive value of copulation changes over time, these mating strategies are expected to be time dependent. Here, we demonstrate that variation in the intensity of male harassment leads to drastic changes in female daily mating patterns. In feral populations of fowl Gallus gallus domesticus, male harassment is intense, particularly in the evening when inseminations are most likely to result in fertilization. We experimentally manipulated the intensity of male harassment through similar-sized groups of different sex ratios. Male mating propensity was always higher than females', particularly in male-biased groups and in the evening, when males were closer to and more likely to approach females. Females counteracted male harassment by escalating resistance to mating and--crucially--by shifting their daily mating pattern: in strongly female-biased groups with relaxed sexual harassment, females solicited sex in the evening, while in male-biased groups, they solicited sex in the morning, thus avoiding harassment in the evening. Together, these results indicate that intersexual conflict may occur not only over mating rates but also over when in the day to copulate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17853985     DOI: 10.1086/518180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  9 in total

1.  Sexual selection and the differential effect of polyandry.

Authors:  Julie Collet; David S Richardson; Kirsty Worley; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Differential female sociality is linked with the fine-scale structure of sexual interactions in replicate groups of red junglefowl, Gallus gallus.

Authors:  Grant C McDonald; Lewis G Spurgin; Eleanor A Fairfield; David S Richardson; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Cryptic female choice favours sperm from major histocompatibility complex-dissimilar males.

Authors:  Hanne Løvlie; Mark A F Gillingham; Kirsty Worley; Tommaso Pizzari; David S Richardson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Experimental evidence that group size generates divergent benefits of cooperative breeding for male and female ostriches.

Authors:  Julian Melgar; Mads F Schou; Maud Bonato; Zanell Brand; Anel Engelbrecht; Schalk W P Cloete; Charlie K Cornwallis
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 8.713

5.  Eyespot display in the peacock butterfly triggers antipredator behaviors in naïve adult fowl.

Authors:  Martin Olofsson; Hanne Løvlie; Jessika Tibblin; Sven Jakobsson; Christer Wiklund
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 2.671

6.  Social status and personality: stability in social state can promote consistency of behavioural responses.

Authors:  Anna Favati; Olof Leimar; Tommy Radesäter; Hanne Løvlie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Sophisticated Fowl: The Complex Behaviour and Cognitive Skills of Chickens and Red Junglefowl.

Authors:  Laura Garnham; Hanne Løvlie
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-17

8.  The contrasting role of male relatedness in different mechanisms of sexual selection in red junglefowl.

Authors:  Cedric Kai Wei Tan; Philippa Doyle; Emma Bagshaw; David S Richardson; Stuart Wigby; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Dynamic phenotypic correlates of social status and mating effort in male and female red junglefowl, Gallus gallus.

Authors:  Rômulo Carleial; Grant C McDonald; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2019-09-28       Impact factor: 2.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.