Literature DB >> 17853200

Competition during the processing of quantifier scope ambiguities: evidence from eye movements during reading.

Kevin B Paterson1, Ruth Filik, Simon P Liversedge.   

Abstract

We investigated the processing of sentences containing a quantifier scope ambiguity, such as Kelly showed a photo to each critic, which is ambiguous between the indefinite phrase (a photo) having one or many referents. Ambiguity resolution requires the computation of relative quantifier scope, with either a photo or each critic taking wide scope, thereby determining the number of referents. Using eye tracking, we established that multiple factors, including the grammatical function and surface linear order of quantified phrases, along with their lexical characteristics, interact during the processing of relative quantifier scope, with conflict between factors incurring a processing cost. We discuss the results in terms of theoretical accounts attributing sentence-processing difficulty to either reanalysis (e.g., Fodor, 1982) or competition between rival analyses (e.g., Kurtzman & MacDonald, 1993).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17853200     DOI: 10.1080/17470210701255317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  3 in total

1.  Quantifiers more or less quantify online: ERP evidence for partial incremental interpretation.

Authors:  Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Evidence for distributivity effects in comprehension.

Authors:  Nikole D Patson; Tessa Warren
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Interpreting quantifier scope ambiguity: evidence of heuristic first, algorithmic second processing.

Authors:  Veena D Dwivedi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.