Literature DB >> 1785275

Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women and aspects of the laboratory diagnostics.

L O Svensson1, I Mares, S E Olsson, M L Nordström.   

Abstract

Nine hundred and thirty-three women who attended consecutively a gynecological clinic for various symptoms, for abortion, or for contraceptives, were screened for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. A total of 95 (10.2%) women were found infected. Of women below 25 years of age, 13.4% were infected, as compared with 4.9% over 25. Women with symptoms of genital infection were not over-represented in the infected population. Enzyme immunoassays (EIA) verified with a direct fluorescence antigen test were evaluated and compared with culture controls. Reactive samples detected using EIA were regarded as true positive if they were also positive according to the verification test. The sensitivity of the verified EIA test was 91%, the specificity 100%, the positive predictive value 100% and the negative predictive value was 99%. The sensitivity of the culture was 90%. Low age is the most predictable risk factor for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Compared with cultures, EIA verified with a direct fluorescence antigen test is a rapid and effective method for clinical use.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion, Induced; Biology; Chlamydia; Contraception; Contraceptive Usage; Developed Countries; Diseases; Europe; Evaluation; Examinations And Diagnoses; Family Planning; Fertility Control, Postconception; Infections; Laboratory Examinations And Diagnoses; Measurement; Northern Europe; Prevalence; Reproductive Tract Infections; Research Methodology; Risk Factors; Scandinavia; Screening; Sexually Transmitted Diseases; Sweden

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1785275     DOI: 10.3109/00016349109007921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  7 in total

1.  Cervical sampling for diagnosis of genital chlamydial infection with a new brush device.

Authors:  L O Svensson; M Domeika; P A Mårdh
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1993-10

2.  Sexual behavior and the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic students in Germany and Spain.

Authors:  C Stock; F Guillén-Grima; L Prüfer-Krämer; I Serrano-Monzo; B Marin-Fernandez; I Aguinaga-Ontoso; A Krämer
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Prevalence and serovar distribution of asymptomatic cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infections as determined by highly sensitive PCR.

Authors:  J Lan; I Melgers; C J Meijer; J M Walboomers; R Roosendaal; C Burger; O P Bleker; A J van den Brule
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  General practice update: chlamydia infection in women.

Authors:  P Oakeshott; P Hay
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Comparison of Chlamydia trachomatis infection among infertile and fertile women in Ahvaz, Iran: A case-control study.

Authors:  Fatemeh Joolayi; Tahereh Navidifar; Razieh Mohammad Jaafari; Mansour Amin
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2017-11

6.  Autophagy induction and PDGFR-β knockdown by siRNA-encapsulated nanoparticles reduce chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Authors:  Sidi Yang; Yannick Traore; Celine Jimenez; Emmanuel A Ho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Genital Chlamydia trachomatis: an update.

Authors:  Meenakshi Malhotra; Seema Sood; Anjan Mukherjee; Sumathi Muralidhar; Manju Bala
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.375

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.