Literature DB >> 17852130

How many is enough? Determining optimal sample sizes for normative studies in pediatric neuropsychology.

Ana J Bridges1, Karen A Holler.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine how confidence intervals (CIs) for pediatric neuropsychological norms vary as a function of sample size, and to determine optimal sample sizes for normative studies. First, the authors calculated 95% CIs for a set of published pediatric norms for four commonly used neuropsychological instruments. Second, 95% CIs were calculated for varying sample size (from n = 5 to n = 500). Results suggest that some pediatric norms have unacceptably wide CIs, and normative studies ought optimally to use 50 to 75 participants per cell. Smaller sample sizes may lead to overpathologizing results, while the cost of obtaining larger samples may not be justifiable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17852130     DOI: 10.1080/09297040701233875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0929-7049            Impact factor:   2.500


  8 in total

1.  A cross-sectional analysis on the effects of age on dual tasking in typically developing children.

Authors:  Shikha Saxena; Annette Majnemer; Karen Li; Miriam Beauchamp; Isabelle Gagnon
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-12-01

2.  The computer-based Symbol Digit Modalities Test: establishing age-expected performance in healthy controls and evaluation of pediatric MS patients.

Authors:  Sandra Bigi; R A Marrie; C Till; E A Yeh; N Akbar; A Feinstein; B L Banwell
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  miR-615-5p prevents proliferation and migration through negatively regulating serine hydromethyltransferase 2 (SHMT2) in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Wu; Liang Deng; Decai Tang; Gang Ying; Xuequan Yao; Fukun Liu; Gui Liang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-12-10

4.  Development and psychometric evaluation of the Test of Practical Judgment alternate form (Form B).

Authors:  Crystal G Guayara-Quinn; Nadia Paré; Rachael L Scott; Camila A Sepulveda; Mindy J Katz; Richard B Lipton; Lynn A Schaefer; Andrew J Saykin; Laura A Rabin
Journal:  Appl Neuropsychol Adult       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 2.050

5.  Anatomical variations of the axilla.

Authors:  Emerson Wander Silva Soares
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-06-24

6.  TOMMORROW neuropsychological battery: German language validation and normative study.

Authors:  Heather R Romero; Andreas U Monsch; Kathleen M Hayden; Brenda L Plassman; Alexandra S Atkins; Richard S E Keefe; Shyama Brewster; Carl Chiang; Janet O'Neil; Grant Runyan; Mark J Atkinson; Stephen Crawford; Kumar Budur; Daniel K Burns; Kathleen A Welsh-Bohmer
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2018-07-14

7.  Normative and Equated Data of the Original and Basic Versions of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment among Community Dwelling Saudi Arabians.

Authors:  Taim A Muayqil; Nada K Alamri; Awyshah M Alqahtani; Sarah S Julaidan; Raya Alsuhaibani; Ibrahim Nafisah; Walid A Alkeridy; Bandar N Aljafen; Mohammed H Alanazy
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.342

8.  Predictive Model Construction for Social-Emotional Competence of Toddlers in Shanghai, China: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Deng Chen; Yilu Huang; Sikun Chen; Yunzhe Huang; Andrew Swain; Jinming Yu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-01-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.