Literature DB >> 17851879

Accuracy of MRI for estimating residual tumor size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: relation to response patterns on MRI.

Hyun Jung Kim1, Young-Hyuck Im, Boo-Kyung Han, Nami Choi, Jeeyun Lee, Jung Han Kim, Yoon-La Choi, Jin-Seok Ahn, Seok-Jin Nam, Young Suk Park, Yeon Hyeon Choe, Young-Hyeh Ko, Jung-Hyun Yang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for estimating residual tumor size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer and assessed whether the tumor pattern on MRI after chemotherapy influenced the accuracy of the MRI measurement of the residual tumor size. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin and docetaxel for locally advanced breast cancer were evaluated with MRI before and after chemotherapy. We compared the residual tumor size measured by MRI with the pathologically determined size and investigated the influence of the residual tumor pattern on MRI (shrinkage, nest or rim, and mixed) and pathologic characteristics on the accuracy of the MRI measurement.
RESULTS: The correlation coefficient between the residual tumor sizes determined by MRI and by pathology was 0.645. The MRI measurement agreed with the pathologically determined size in 36 patients (72%) and disagreed in 14 patients 928%), overestimating the size in 13 (26%) and underestimating the size in one (2%). disagreement appeared to be more frequent in the cases showing a nest or rim pattern than in those exhibiting a shrinkage pattern, although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.119).
CONCLUSIONS: MRI is an accurate method for predicting the extent of residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy; however, it may overestimate the residual disease, especially in cases showing a nest or rim tumor pattern and in those having combined lesions with ductal carcinoma in situ or multiple scattered nodules after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17851879     DOI: 10.1080/02841860701373587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  19 in total

1.  Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Compared With Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessing the Tumor Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sandy C Lee; Edward Grant; Pulin Sheth; Agustin A Garcia; Bhushan Desai; Lingyun Ji; Susan Groshen; Darryl Hwang; Mary Yamashita; Linda Hovanessian-Larsen
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for assessing tumor response in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with molecular biomarker profile.

Authors:  Aida Kuzucan; Jeon-Hor Chen; Shadfar Bahri; Rita S Mehta; Philip M Carpenter; Peter T Fwu; Hon J Yu; David J B Hsiang; Karen T Lane; John A Butler; Stephen A Feig; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The use of breast imaging for predicting response to neoadjuvant lapatinib, trastuzumab and their combination in HER2-positive breast cancer: Results from Neo-ALTTO.

Authors:  S Di Cosimo; C Campbell; H A Azim; G Galli; G Bregni; G Curigliano; C Criscitiello; M Izquierdo; L de la Pena; D Fumagalli; L Fein; J Vinholes; W M J Ng; M Colleoni; A Ferro; B J Naume; A Patel; J Huober; M J Piccart-Gebhart; J Baselga; E de Azambuja
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 4.  MRI in breast cancer therapy monitoring.

Authors:  Rebekah McLaughlin; Nola Hylton
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 4.044

5.  MRI evaluation of neoadjuvant low-dose fractionated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  E Bufi; P Belli; M Costantini; P Rinaldi; M Di Matteo; A Bonatesta; M C De Santis; L Nardone; D Terribile; A Mulé; L Bonomo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Surgical patterns of care in patients with invasive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy and breast magnetic resonance imaging: results of a secondary analysis of TBCRC 017.

Authors:  Kandace P McGuire; E Shelley Hwang; Alan Cantor; Mehra Golshan; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Janet K Horton; Rita Nanda; Keith D Amos; Andres Forero; Cliff A Hudis; Ingrid Meszoely; Jennifer F De Los Santos
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Frequency and Clinical Significance of Extramammary Findings on Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Sneha Phadke; Alexandra Thomas; Limin Yang; Catherine Moore; Chang Xia; Mary C Schroeder
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Giorgia Pasquero; Alessandra Surace; Antonio Ponti; Massimiliano Bortolini; Donatella Tota; Maria Piera Mano; Riccardo Arisio; Chiara Benedetto; Maria Grazia Baù
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Impact of factors affecting the residual tumor size diagnosed by MRI following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in comparison to pathology.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Shadfar Bahri; Rita S Mehta; Philip M Carpenter; Christine E McLaren; Wen-Pin Chen; Peter T Fwu; David J B Hsiang; Karen T Lane; John A Butler; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Factors affecting the concordance of radiologic and pathologic tumor size in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Ameer Hamza; Sidrah Khawar; Ramen Sakhi; Ahmed Alrajjal; Shelby Miller; Warda Ibrar; Jacob Edens; Sajad Salehi; Daniel Ockner
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2018-10-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.