OBJECTIVES: Although many studies have explored the association between antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance, definitions of "exposure" (i.e., prior antimicrobial use) differ across such studies. Specifically, it has been noted that some studies define "exposure" as any antimicrobial use, while others require the administration of at least 24 or 48 h of an antimicrobial to constitute "exposure." The impact of different definitions of exposure on final study results is unknown. We conducted the current study to determine the impact of varying the minimum threshold of prior antimicrobial use to define exposure status in studies of antimicrobial resistance. METHODS: We used a dataset from a prior study of risk factors for fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (FQRPA) to address the study aim. Four separate multivariable models of risk factors for FQRPA were built. Each model defined a different threshold for the duration of antimicrobial administration to determine "exposure" to that antimicrobial: (1) no threshold (i.e., a subject is considered exposed if any use of the antimicrobial was documented); (2) >24 h of use of the antimicrobial is necessary to be considered exposed; (3) >48 h of use is required; and (4) >72 h of use is required. Except for these definitions, the four multivariable models were built in exactly the same way, each using prior FQ use as the primary risk factor of interest. RESULTS: Among 872 P. aeruginosa isolates included in the original dataset, 332 (38.2%) were FQ-resistant. Each of the four multivariable models identified prior FQ use as an independent risk factor for FQRPA. However, as increasingly strict thresholds were used, the association between FQ use and FQRPA increased. Furthermore, prior use of an agent with activity against anaerobic bacteria was associated with FQRPA in models 2, 3 and 4, but not in model 1. CONCLUSIONS: The use of different thresholds to define prior "exposure" to antimicrobials altered the associations between antimicrobial use and resistance. Stricter thresholds resulted in a higher estimate of the association between antimicrobial use and resistance. Furthermore, different risk factors may be identified depending on how exposure is defined. Greater attention to this issue is necessary to optimize identification of modifiable risk factors for resistance as well as accurately compare results across studies.
OBJECTIVES: Although many studies have explored the association between antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance, definitions of "exposure" (i.e., prior antimicrobial use) differ across such studies. Specifically, it has been noted that some studies define "exposure" as any antimicrobial use, while others require the administration of at least 24 or 48 h of an antimicrobial to constitute "exposure." The impact of different definitions of exposure on final study results is unknown. We conducted the current study to determine the impact of varying the minimum threshold of prior antimicrobial use to define exposure status in studies of antimicrobial resistance. METHODS: We used a dataset from a prior study of risk factors for fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (FQRPA) to address the study aim. Four separate multivariable models of risk factors for FQRPA were built. Each model defined a different threshold for the duration of antimicrobial administration to determine "exposure" to that antimicrobial: (1) no threshold (i.e., a subject is considered exposed if any use of the antimicrobial was documented); (2) >24 h of use of the antimicrobial is necessary to be considered exposed; (3) >48 h of use is required; and (4) >72 h of use is required. Except for these definitions, the four multivariable models were built in exactly the same way, each using prior FQ use as the primary risk factor of interest. RESULTS: Among 872 P. aeruginosa isolates included in the original dataset, 332 (38.2%) were FQ-resistant. Each of the four multivariable models identified prior FQ use as an independent risk factor for FQRPA. However, as increasingly strict thresholds were used, the association between FQ use and FQRPA increased. Furthermore, prior use of an agent with activity against anaerobic bacteria was associated with FQRPA in models 2, 3 and 4, but not in model 1. CONCLUSIONS: The use of different thresholds to define prior "exposure" to antimicrobials altered the associations between antimicrobial use and resistance. Stricter thresholds resulted in a higher estimate of the association between antimicrobial use and resistance. Furthermore, different risk factors may be identified depending on how exposure is defined. Greater attention to this issue is necessary to optimize identification of modifiable risk factors for resistance as well as accurately compare results across studies.
Authors: J Kristie Johnson; Gwen L Robinson; Lisa L Pineles; Adebola O Ajao; LiCheng Zhao; Jennifer S Albrecht; Anthony D Harris; Kerri A Thom; Jon P Furuno Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-03-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Nazaret Cobos-Trigueros; Mar Solé; Pedro Castro; Jorge Luis Torres; Cristina Hernández; Mariano Rinaudo; Sara Fernández; Álex Soriano; José María Nicolás; Josep Mensa; Jordi Vila; José Antonio Martínez Journal: Crit Care Date: 2015-05-04 Impact factor: 9.097