AIMS: We examine the phenomenon of low-frequency smoking (non-daily smoking or smoking </= 5 cigarettes daily) among California Latinos and address its implications for addiction theory and population tobacco control. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data gathered in 2001 and 2003 through the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS), the largest general health survey in California. The present study focused on Latino current smokers (n = 1254 for CHIS 2001; n = 946 for CHIS 2003). MEASUREMENT: Latino smokers reporting either non-daily smoking or smoking </=5 cigarettes daily were identified and grouped into one category: low-frequency smokers. FINDINGS: Weighted by population parameters, more than 70% of Latino smokers in California were found to be low-frequency smokers [70.7% (CI = 67.2%, 73.9%) in 2001 and 70.8% (CI = 67.1%-74.2%) in 2003]. This high proportion cut across all demographic dimensions in both surveys, suggesting pervasiveness and reliability of this phenomenon. Proportions for non-daily smokers and low-rate daily smokers were 48.6% and 22.1% in 2001 and 54.9% and 15.9% in 2003. In both surveys, more than 80% of non-daily smokers consumed </= 5 cigarettes on their smoking days. CONCLUSIONS: The fact that most Latino smokers are low-frequency smokers calls for a new theoretical framework--beyond withdrawal-based theories--to account for the prevalence of this behavior on the population level. It also calls into question the harm-reduction approach as a tobacco control strategy for California Latino populations. Strategies emphasizing that every cigarette can hurt, and encouraging complete cessation, seem more fitting for this group of smokers.
AIMS: We examine the phenomenon of low-frequency smoking (non-daily smoking or smoking </= 5 cigarettes daily) among California Latinos and address its implications for addiction theory and population tobacco control. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data gathered in 2001 and 2003 through the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS), the largest general health survey in California. The present study focused on Latino current smokers (n = 1254 for CHIS 2001; n = 946 for CHIS 2003). MEASUREMENT: Latino smokers reporting either non-daily smoking or smoking </=5 cigarettes daily were identified and grouped into one category: low-frequency smokers. FINDINGS: Weighted by population parameters, more than 70% of Latino smokers in California were found to be low-frequency smokers [70.7% (CI = 67.2%, 73.9%) in 2001 and 70.8% (CI = 67.1%-74.2%) in 2003]. This high proportion cut across all demographic dimensions in both surveys, suggesting pervasiveness and reliability of this phenomenon. Proportions for non-daily smokers and low-rate daily smokers were 48.6% and 22.1% in 2001 and 54.9% and 15.9% in 2003. In both surveys, more than 80% of non-daily smokers consumed </= 5 cigarettes on their smoking days. CONCLUSIONS: The fact that most Latino smokers are low-frequency smokers calls for a new theoretical framework--beyond withdrawal-based theories--to account for the prevalence of this behavior on the population level. It also calls into question the harm-reduction approach as a tobacco control strategy for California Latino populations. Strategies emphasizing that every cigarette can hurt, and encouraging complete cessation, seem more fitting for this group of smokers.
Authors: Yessenia Castro; Michael S Businelle; Virmarie Correa-Fernández; Darla E Kendzor; Carlos A Mazas; Ludmila Cofta-Woerpel; David W Wetter Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Jennifer Irvin Vidrine; Damon J Vidrine; Tracy J Costello; Carlos Mazas; Ludmila Cofta-Woerpel; Luz Maria Mejia; David W Wetter Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2009-08-20 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Chris R E Coggins; E Lenn Murrelle; Richard A Carchman; Christian Heidbreder Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2009-10-03 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Yessenia Castro; Darla E Kendzor; Michael S Businelle; Carlos A Mazas; Ludmila Cofta-Woerpel; Paul M Cinciripini; David W Wetter Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2011-03-31 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Kim Pulvers; A Paula Cupertino; Taneisha S Scheuermann; Lisa Sanderson Cox; Yen-Yi Ho; Nicole L Nollen; Ruby Cuellar; Jasjit S Ahluwalia Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Kathryn I Pollak; Susan Denman; Kristina Coop Gordon; Pauline Lyna; Pilar Rocha; Rebecca N Brouwer; Laura Fish; Donald H Baucom Journal: Ethn Health Date: 2010 Impact factor: 2.772