Literature DB >> 17850555

Multiple paternity and kin recognition mechanisms in a guppy population.

Timothy J A Hain1, Bryan D Neff.   

Abstract

Help directed toward kin (nepotism) is an important example of social behaviour. Such helping behaviour requires a mechanism to distinguish kin from nonkin. The prevailing kin recognition hypothesis is that when familiarity is a reliable cue of relatedness, other mechanisms of recognition will not evolve. However, when familiarity is an unreliable cue of relatedness, kin recognition by phenotype matching is instead predicted to evolve. Here we use genetic markers to show that guppies (Poecilia reticulata) from a population in a tributary of the Paria River in Trinidad are characterized by a high degree of multiple mating with 95% of broods having more than one sire and some dams having offspring sired by six males. These levels of multiple mating are the highest reported among live-bearing fishes. The mean relatedness of brood-mates was 0.36 (as compared to 0.5 for full-siblings). Therefore, familiarity does not seem to be a reliable mechanism to assess full-sibling relatedness. Using two-choice behavioural trials, we found that juveniles from this population use both phenotype matching and familiarity to distinguish kin from nonkin. However, we did not find strong evidence that the guppies use these mechanisms to form shoals of related individuals as adults, which is similar to results from other guppy populations in Trinidad. The use of both familiarity and phenotype matching is discussed in the context of the Paria River guppy population's mating system and ecology. Overall, these data provide support for the kin recognition hypothesis and increase our understanding of the evolution of kin recognition systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17850555     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03443.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  16 in total

1.  Multiple mating and its relationship to alternative modes of gestation in male-pregnant versus female-pregnant fish species.

Authors:  John C Avise; Jin-Xian Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  No evidence for sperm priming responses under varying sperm competition risk or intensity in guppies.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-03-24

3.  Imminent risk of predation reduces the relative strength of postcopulatory sexual selection in the guppy.

Authors:  Alexandra Glavaschi; Silvia Cattelan; Alessandro Grapputo; Andrea Pilastro
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Kin assortment in juvenile shoals in wild guppy populations.

Authors:  C Piyapong; R K Butlin; J J Faria; K J Scruton; J Wang; J Krause
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  The role of relatedness in structuring the social network of a wild guppy population.

Authors:  Darren P Croft; P B Hamilton; S K Darden; D M P Jacoby; R James; E M Bettaney; C R Tyler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Female choice and the relatedness of mates in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): mate choice and inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Trevor E Pitcher; F Helen Rodd; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  Implications of multiple mating for offspring relatedness and shoaling behaviour in juvenile guppies.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans; Jennifer L Kelley
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Female presence influences sperm velocity in the guppy.

Authors:  Clelia Gasparini; Alfredo V Peretti; Andrea Pilastro
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Males optimally balance selfish and kin-selected strategies of sexual competition in the guppy.

Authors:  Mitchel J Daniel; Robert J Williamson
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 15.460

10.  Lifetime number of mates interacts with female age to determine reproductive success in female guppies.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.