Literature DB >> 17850494

Managerial leadership for nurses' use of research evidence: an integrative review of the literature.

Wendy Gifford1, Barbara Davies, Nancy Edwards, Pat Griffin, Vanessa Lybanon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Integration of research evidence into clinical nursing practice is essential for the delivery of high-quality nursing care. Leadership behaviours of nurse managers and administrators have been identified as important to support research use and evidence-based practice. Yet minimal evidence exists indicating what constitutes effective nursing leadership for this purpose, or what kinds of interventions help leaders to successfully influence research-based care. AIMS: (1) To describe leadership activities of nurse managers that influence nurses' use of research evidence; and (2) to identify interventions aimed at supporting nurse managers to influence research use in clinical nursing practice.
METHODS: A search of electronic databases was conducted for studies on behaviours or activities of nurse managers/administrators and the use of research evidence by nurses. Sifting, screening, and quality assessments were done by two reviewers. Results were synthesized by study type (quantitative and qualitative) and reported.
RESULTS: Twelve studies met inclusion criteria (eight quantitative, four qualitative). Three activities were found in quantitative studies that influenced nurses' use of research: managerial support, policy revisions, and auditing. Qualitative studies showed organizational issues as barriers to managers' abilities to affect research use, while role modeling and valuing research facilitated research use. Four studies, one of which was experimental, included an intervention to support managers, but all had insufficient information about leadership development.
CONCLUSIONS: To date, important descriptive work highlights the strategic role managers have in research transfer. Both facilitative and regulatory activities appear to be necessary for managers to influence research use. These findings have important implications for evolving theoretical models describing factors that affect the process of research utilization. It is time to move the science forward and test a hypothesis linking leadership to outcomes. Qualitative methods are essential for understanding the process of leadership for research transfer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17850494     DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2007.00095.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs        ISSN: 1545-102X            Impact factor:   2.931


  36 in total

Review 1.  Mining the management literature for insights into implementing evidence-based change in healthcare.

Authors:  Karen Harlos; Jacqueline Tetroe; Ian D Graham; Madeleine Bird; Nicole Robinson
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2012-08

2.  Developing Leadership in Managers to Facilitate the Implementation of National Guideline Recommendations: A Process Evaluation of Feasibility and Usefulness.

Authors:  Malin Tistad; Susanne Palmcrantz; Lars Wallin; Anna Ehrenberg; Christina B Olsson; Göran Tomson; Lotta Widén Holmqvist; Wendy Gifford; Ann Catrine Eldh
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2016-08-01

3.  Nurses' research utilization two years after graduation--a national survey of associated individual, organizational, and educational factors.

Authors:  Henrietta Forsman; Ann Rudman; Petter Gustavsson; Anna Ehrenberg; Lars Wallin
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Study protocol for the translating research in elder care (TREC): building context through case studies in long-term care project (project two).

Authors:  Jo Rycroft-Malone; Sue Dopson; Lesley Degner; Alison M Hutchinson; Debra Morgan; Norma Stewart; Carole A Estabrooks
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Institutionalizing evidence-based practice: an organizational case study using a model of strategic change.

Authors:  Cheryl B Stetler; Judith A Ritchie; Jo Rycroft-Malone; Alyce A Schultz; Martin P Charns
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Evaluation of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) guideline implementation in the Veterans Affairs Medical Centers using the consolidated framework for implementation research.

Authors:  Cassie Cunningham Goedken; Marylou Guihan; Charnetta R Brown; Swetha Ramanathan; Amanda Vivo; Katie J Suda; Margaret A Fitzpatrick; Linda Poggensee; Eli N Perencevich; Michael Rubin; Heather Schacht Reisinger; Martin Evans; Charlesnika T Evans
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2021-06-29

7.  Factors associated with evidence-based practice among registered nurses in Sweden: a national cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Boström; Ann Rudman; Anna Ehrenberg; Jens Petter Gustavsson; Lars Wallin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-05-04       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Insights about the process and impact of implementing nursing guidelines on delivery of care in hospitals and community settings.

Authors:  Barbara Davies; Nancy Edwards; Jenny Ploeg; Tazim Virani
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  A mixed methods pilot study with a cluster randomized control trial to evaluate the impact of a leadership intervention on guideline implementation in home care nursing.

Authors:  Wendy A Gifford; Barbara Davies; Ian D Graham; Nancy Lefebre; Ann Tourangeau; Kirsten Woodend
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 10.  The relationship between first-level leadership and inner-context and implementation outcomes in behavioral health: a scoping review.

Authors:  Rosemary D Meza; Noah S Triplett; Grace S Woodard; Prerna Martin; Alya N Khairuzzaman; Gabrielle Jamora; Shannon Dorsey
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.