Literature DB >> 17850412

The impact of prolonged pH measurements on the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease: 4-day wireless pH studies.

Giuseppe Scarpulla1, Salvatore Camilleri, Pietro Galante, Miohele Manganaro, Mark Fox.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prolonged, 4-day (96 h) measurement by the wireless Bravo system provides an opportunity to assess the variance, diagnostic reproducibility, and yield of 24- and 48-h pH and symptom association studies.
METHOD: Retrospective analysis of 83 patients with suspected reflux symptoms undergoing wireless pH monitoring with the intention of 96-h measurement. Study periods were classified based on esophageal acid exposure, the DeMeester score (DMS), and the association of reflux events and symptoms (symptom index). The technical success of prolonged pH recording and diagnostic accuracy of 24-, 48-, and 72-h pH studies compared to the 96-h "gold standard" were assessed.
RESULTS: Prolonged Bravo pH studies were possible and well tolerated in routine clinical practice. Complete 96-h recordings were available for 34/83 (41%) patients. Variation in pH measurements reduced with increasing study duration (24-h 45%vs 48-h 27%, P<0.01), but no change in reflux severity over time was observed (ANOVA, P=ns). Abnormal acid exposure was found in 7 (19%) on every test day and 21 (58%) on at least one of four test days. A diagnosis consistent with the 96-h "gold standard" was present in 22 (63%), 29 (83%), and 32 (91%) patients for 24-, 48-, and 72-h test periods, respectively, with a significant improvement of diagnostic sensitivity with study duration (P<0.01). Similar findings were present for symptom association.
CONCLUSION: Increasing the duration of pH studies progressively improves measurement variance and the diagnostic reproducibility of reflux studies. Future studies must address the impact of prolonged pH studies on clinical management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17850412     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01461.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  18 in total

1.  24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring may be an inadequate test for detecting gastroesophageal reflux in patients with mixed typical and atypical symptoms.

Authors:  Michelle S Han; Michal J Lada; Dylan R Nieman; Andreas Tschoner; Christian G Peyre; Carolyn E Jones; Thomas J Watson; Jeffrey H Peters
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The effect of antisecretory therapy and study duration on ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  Vladimir M Kushnir; Gregory S Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Interplay between intestinal pH, transit time and feed status on the in vivo performance of pH responsive ileo-colonic release systems.

Authors:  Valentine C Ibekwe; Hala M Fadda; Emma L McConnell; Mandeep K Khela; David F Evans; Abdul W Basit
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  New Developments in the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux.

Authors:  Yan Jiang; John O Clarke
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-02-19

5.  Trajectory assessment is useful when day-to-day esophageal acid exposure varies in prolonged wireless pH monitoring.

Authors:  R Yadlapati; J D Ciolino; J Craft; S Roman; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 6.  The role of oesophageal physiological testing in the assessment of noncardiac chest pain.

Authors:  Henriette Heinrich; Rami Sweis
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  Prolonged Wireless pH Monitoring in Patients With Persistent Reflux Symptoms Despite Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy.

Authors:  Stephen Hasak; Rena Yadlapati; Osama Altayar; Rami Sweis; Emily Tucker; Kevin Knowles; Mark Fox; John Pandolfino; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 8.  Advances in the evaluation and management of esophageal disease of systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Dustin A Carlson; Monique Hinchcliff; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.592

9.  Esophageal motility in nonacid reflux compared with acid reflux.

Authors:  Victor S Wang; Natan Feldman; Rie Maurer; Robert Burakoff
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 10.  Wireless 24, 48, and 96 Hour or Impedance or Oropharyngeal Prolonged pH Monitoring: Which Test, When, and Why for GERD?

Authors:  Soojong Chae; Joel E Richter
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2018-09-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.