Literature DB >> 17850409

The impact of body mass index on the application of on-demand therapy for Los Angeles grades A and B reflux esophagitis.

Bor-Shyang Sheu1, Hsiu-Chi Cheng, Wei-Lun Chang, Wei-Ying Chen, Ai-Wen Kao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with Los Angeles grade A or B reflux esophagitis (RE-AB) can potentially be switched from active-phase therapy to on-demand esomeprazole as maintenance therapy. Body mass index (BMI) correlates significantly with reflux symptoms. We investigated whether BMI affects the efficacy of esomeprazole in active-phase or subsequent on-demand therapy.
METHODS: Three hundred fifty patients with RE-AB were prospectively enrolled to receive an 8-wk course of esomeprazole (40 mg/day) as active-phase therapy. Based on the daily severity of acid regurgitation and heartburn, the cumulative proportions of patients with sustained symptomatic response (SSR), defined as free from symptoms for the last 7 days, were compared among different BMI groups (control: BMI <25 kg/m2, overweight: BMI 25-30 kg/m2, obese: BMI >30 kg/m2). In patients who had achieved SSR by week 8, on-demand therapy for 2 months was started. The number of 40-mg esomeprazole tablets used per 4-wk period was recorded.
RESULTS: SSR rates were lower in both the overweight and obese groups than in the control group (P < 0.001). During on-demand therapy, the mean number of tablets used per 4-wk period was lower in the control group than in either the overweight or the obese group (13.2 vs 15.3 or 16.2, P < 0.05). The failure rate of on-demand therapy increased with increasing BMI-2.4%, 5.3%, and 14.2%, respectively, for the control, overweight, and obese groups (P= 0.002).
CONCLUSION: For RE-AB, a higher BMI decreases the rate of SSR after 8-wk of esomeprazole therapy, and increases the need for medication and the failure rate of on-demand therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17850409     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01468.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  7 in total

1.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease and obesity: not as simple as we may think.

Authors:  Joel E Richter
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Supplementation of Los Angeles classification with esophageal mucosa index of hemoglobin can predict the treatment response of erosive reflux esophagitis.

Authors:  Hsin Cheng; Yu-Ching Tsai; Wei-Ying Chen; Wei-Lun Chang; Hsiu-Chi Cheng; Bor-Shyang Sheu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Controlling on-demand gastric acidity in obese subjects: a randomized, controlled trial comparing a single dose of 20 mg rabeprazole and 20 mg omeprazole.

Authors:  Kafia Belhocine; Fabienne Vavasseur; Christelle Volteau; Laurent Flet; Yann Touchefeu; Stanislas Bruley des Varannes
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Recurrence and Its Impact on the Health-related Quality of Life in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Prospective Follow-up Analysis.

Authors:  Yang Won Min; Yong Woon Shin; Gab Jin Cheon; Kyung Sik Park; Hyun Soo Kim; Chong-Il Sohn; Tae Nyeun Kim; Hyeung Cheol Moon; Poong-Lyul Rhee
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-01-31       Impact factor: 4.924

5.  The effects of increasing body mass index on heartburn severity, frequency and response to treatment with dexlansoprazole or lansoprazole.

Authors:  D A Peura; B Pilmer; B Hunt; R Mody; M C Perez
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 8.171

6.  The effect of metabolic risk factors on the natural course of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Y-C Lee; A M-F Yen; J J Tai; S-H Chang; J-T Lin; H-M Chiu; H-P Wang; M-S Wu; T H-H Chen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation After Gastric Surgery.

Authors:  Carlo Galdino Riva; Emanuele Asti; Veronica Lazzari; Krizia Aquilino; Stefano Siboni; Luigi Bonavina
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.