Literature DB >> 17850368

Prostate-specific antigen velocity in untreated, localized prostate cancer.

Ramachandran Venkitaraman1, Andrew Norman, Ruth Woode-Amissah, David Dearnaley, Alan Horwich, Robert Huddart, Chris Parker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the results of a prospective study of active surveillance of untreated prostate cancer, with a focus on baseline predictors of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity, as PSA velocity before treatment is an important predictor of prostate cancer mortality, and patients on active surveillance are monitored for several years to estimate the PSA velocity and thus select patients for radical treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study of active surveillance for localized prostate cancer opened at the Royal Marsden Hospital in 2002. Eligible patients had clinical stage T1/T2a, N0/Nx, M0/Mx adenocarcinoma of the prostate with a serum PSA level of < 15 ng/mL, a Gleason score of < or = 7 with primary grade < or = 3, and less than half the biopsy cores positive. The PSA velocity before treatment was analysed in relation to baseline clinical characteristics.
RESULTS: In all, 237 patients on surveillance were followed for a median of 24 months (median age 67 years; median initial PSA level 6.5 ng/mL; median pretreatment PSA velocity 0.44 ng/mL per year). On multivariate analysis, PSA density (i.e. serum PSA level/prostate volume) was the only significant determinant of PSA velocity (P < 0.001). Patients with a PSA density above or below the median (0.185 ng/mL/mL) had a median (interquartile range) PSA velocity of 0.92 (0.34-1.77) ng/mL per year and 0.35 (-0.06, 0.80) ng/mL per year, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: PSA density, which is readily available at the time of diagnosis, is an independent determinant of PSA velocity in untreated, localized prostate cancer. If this is confirmed, PSA density could be used to inform the often difficult choice between active surveillance and immediate radical treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17850368     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07175.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  4 in total

Review 1.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of clinicopathologic variables and biomarkers for risk stratification.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Sophie M Bruinsma; Joseph Nicholson; Alberto Briganti; Tom Pickles; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Serum micronutrient and antioxidant levels at baseline and the natural history of men with localised prostate cancer on active surveillance.

Authors:  Ramachandran Venkitaraman; Karen Thomas; Phillip Grace; David P Dearnaley; Alan Horwich; Robert A Huddart; Christopher C Parker
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2010-02-16

Review 3.  Watchful waiting versus active surveillance: appropriate patient selection.

Authors:  Marc A Dall'Era; Christopher J Kane
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Consensus statements on the management of clinically localized prostate cancer from the Hong Kong Urological Association and the Hong Kong Society of Uro-Oncology.

Authors:  Wai-Kit Ma; Darren Ming-Chun Poon; Chi-Kwok Chan; Tim-Wai Chan; Foon-Yiu Cheung; Lap-Yin Ho; Eric Ka-Chai Lee; Angus Kwong-Chuen Leung; Simon Yiu-Lam Leung; Hing-Shing So; Po-Chor Tam; Philip Wai-Kay Kwong
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 5.588

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.