Literature DB >> 17849907

House fly (Diptera: Muscidae) activity near baits containing (Z)-9-tricosene and efficacy of commercial toxic fly baits on a southern California dairy.

Sarah M Butler1, Alec C Gerry, Bradley A Mullens.   

Abstract

Sticky card captures of house flies, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae), were used to compare efficacy of screen-covered baits containing sugar, sugar and 0.1% (Z)-9-tricosene, sugar and 1.0% (Z)-9-tricosene, Golden Malrin [1.1% methomyl and 0.049% (Z)-9-tricosene], and Quick-Bayt [0.5% imidacloprid and 0.1% (Z)-9-tricosene]. The QuickBayt treatment caught more flies per hour (mean = 116.5) than sugar alone (mean = 81.0), but the addition of (Z)-9-tricosene to sugar did not increase fly capture compared with sugar alone. More males (65% of total) than females were collected on the sticky cards for all treatments. Fly kill by plain sugar (control) and the commercial baits Golden Malrin, QuikStrike Fly Abatement strips (1.0% nithiazine), and QuickBayt was tested over a 90-min period. An average of 1.4, 5.6, 363.0, and 1,266.0 flies were killed using sugar, Golden Malrin, QuikStrike, and QuickBayt, respectively. The similarity between Golden Malrin and plain sugar reflects severe resistance to this once effective methomyl bait. A no-choice feeding assay using lab-reared methomyl-susceptible and methomyl-resistant house flies was conducted with and without (Z)-9-tricosene. Adult mortality was significantly higher in the methomyl-susceptible strain exposed to treatments containing methomyl. Lower consumption of the methomyl treatments by resistant flies suggested resistance was behavioral and mortality was not influenced by (Z)-9-tricosene for either fly strain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17849907     DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493(2007)100[1489:hfdman]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  8 in total

Review 1.  Sex pheromones and their impact on pest management.

Authors:  Peter Witzgall; Philipp Kirsch; Alan Cork
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Efficacy of cyantraniliprole fly bait against housefly (Musca domestica L.) under laboratory conditions.

Authors:  Q F Li; X Li; J B Hunag; D M Zhang; J Z Yuan
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  (Z)-9-Tricosene based Musca domestica lure study on a garbage dump yard using plywood sticky trap baited with fish meal.

Authors:  S T Bino Sundar; Bhaskaran Ravi Latha; R Vijayashanthi; Serma Saravana Pandian
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2013-11-20

4.  Cross-resistance, stability, and fitness cost of resistance to imidacloprid in Musca domestica L., (Diptera: Muscidae).

Authors:  Naeem Abbas; Hussnain Khan; Sarfraz Ali Shad
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Resistance to new chemical insecticides in the house fly, Musca domestica L., from dairies in Punjab, Pakistan.

Authors:  Hafiz Azhar Ali Khan; Sarfraz Ali Shad; Waseem Akram
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2013-03-03       Impact factor: 2.289

6.  Comparing trap designs and methods for assessing density of synanthropic flies in Odisha, India.

Authors:  Melissa Bell; Seth Irish; Wolf Peter Schmidt; Soumya Nayak; Thomas Clasen; Mary Cameron
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Development of a Mycoinsecticide Bait Formulation for the Control of House Flies, Musca domestica L.

Authors:  Dalton Baker; Steven Rice; Diana Leemon; Rosamond Godwin; Peter James
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.769

8.  Evaluation of Cyantraniliprole and Other Commercial Fly Baits under Laboratory and Field Conditions.

Authors:  Casey Parker; Rebecca Baldwin; Roberto Pereira; Philip Koehler
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 2.769

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.