Literature DB >> 17849433

Reducing the length of mental health instruments through structurally incomplete designs.

Niels Smits1, Pim Cuijpers, Aartjan T F Beekman, Johannes H Smit.   

Abstract

This paper presents structurally incomplete designs as an approach to reduce the length of mental health tests. In structurally incomplete test designs, respondents only fill out a subset of the total item set. The scores on the unadministered items are estimated using methods for missing data. As an illustration, structurally incomplete test designs recording, respectively, two thirds, one half, one third and one quarter of the complete item set were applied to item scores on the Centre of Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale of the respondents in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA). The resulting unobserved item scores were estimated with the missing data method Data Augmentation. The complete and reconstructed data yielded very similar total scores and depression classifications. In contrast, the diagnostic accuracy of the incomplete designs decreased as the designs had more unobserved item scores. The discussion addresses the strengths and limitations of the application of incomplete designs in mental health research. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17849433      PMCID: PMC6878511          DOI: 10.1002/mpr.223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 1049-8931            Impact factor:   4.035


  15 in total

1.  Missing data: our view of the state of the art.

Authors:  Joseph L Schafer; John W Graham
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2002-06

2.  Investigation and Treatment of Missing Item Scores in Test and Questionnaire Data.

Authors:  Klaas Sijtsma; L Andries van der Ark
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Maximizing the Usefulness of Data Obtained with Planned Missing Value Patterns: An Application of Maximum Likelihood Procedures.

Authors:  J W Graham; S M Hofer; D P MacKinnon
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1996-04-01       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  The effect of misclassification on the estimation of association: a review.

Authors:  Michael Höfler
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.035

5.  The validity and power of tests for equality of two correlated proportions.

Authors:  W L May; W D Johnson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of the original 30-item and shortened versions of the Geriatric Depression Scale in nursing home patients.

Authors:  K Jongenelis; A M Pot; A M H Eisses; D L Gerritsen; M Derksen; A T F Beekman; H Kluiter; M W Ribbe
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.485

7.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Criterion validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D): results from a community-based sample of older subjects in The Netherlands.

Authors:  A T Beekman; D J Deeg; J Van Limbeek; A W Braam; M Z De Vries; W Van Tilburg
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.723

9.  [A screening tool for depression in the elderly in the general population: the usefulness of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)].

Authors:  A T Beekman; J van Limbeek; D J Deeg; L Wouters; W van Tilburg
Journal:  Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  1994-06

10.  Reliability and validity of five mental health scales in older persons.

Authors:  S Himmelfarb; S A Murrell
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1983-05
View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of short scales to measure depressive symptoms in elders with diabetes.

Authors:  Jaclene A Zauszniewski; Gregory C Graham
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  When less is more: reducing redundancy in mental health and psychosocial instruments using Item Response Theory.

Authors:  Emily E Haroz; Jeremy C Kane; Amanda J Nguyen; Judith K Bass; Laura K Murray; Paul Bolton
Journal:  Glob Ment Health (Camb)       Date:  2020-01-09

3.  A proof of principle for using adaptive testing in Routine Outcome Monitoring: the efficiency of the Mood and Anxiety Symptoms Questionnaire -Anhedonic Depression CAT.

Authors:  Niels Smits; Frans G Zitman; Pim Cuijpers; Margien E den Hollander-Gijsman; Ingrid V E Carlier
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 4.615

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.