Literature DB >> 17849237

Evaluation of left atrial systolic function in noncompaction cardiomyopathy by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography.

Attila Nemes1, Ashraf M Anwar, Kadir Caliskan, Osama I I Soliman, Bas M van Dalen, Marcel L Geleijnse, Folkert J ten Cate.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Noncompaction cardiomyopathy (NCCM) is a rare disorder with persistance of the embryonic pattern of myoarchitecture. NCCM is characterized by loosened, spongy myocardium associated with a high incidence of systolic and diastolic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and heart failure (HF). It is known that LV dysfunction contributes to elevated left atrial (LA) and pulmonary vascular pressures, however atrial function has not been examined in NCCM. The objective of the present study was to assess LA systolic function characterized by LA ejection force (LAEF) in NCCM patients using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) and to compare to control subjects.
METHODS: The study comprised 17 patients with an established diagnosis of NCCM and their results were compared to 17 healthy age-matched controls with no evidence of cardiovascular disease. Forty-one percent of NCCM patients were in NYHA functional class II / III HF. Previously proposed echocardiographic diagnostic criteria for NCCM were used. All patients underwent conventional two-dimensional echocardiography and RT3DE. LAEF was measured based on MA annulus diameter (LAEF 3D-MAD) and area (LAEF 3D-MAA) using RT3DE.
RESULTS: The presence and severity of mitral regurgitation were more frequent in NCCM patients than in control subjects. LV diameters and mitral annulus were significantly increased in NCCM patients. Compared with control subjects, both LAEF 3D-MAD (3.8 +/- 2.2 vs 2.3 +/- 1.0 kdyne, P < 0.05) and LAEF 3D-MAA (12.7 +/- 7.6 vs 4.9 +/- 2.1 kdyne, P < 0.01) were significantly increased in NCCM patients.
CONCLUSIONS: LAEF as a characteristic of LA systolic function is increased in NCCM patients compared to normal individuals. These results can suggest compensating left atrial work against the dysfunctional LV in NCCM patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17849237      PMCID: PMC2233707          DOI: 10.1007/s10554-007-9261-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


Introduction

Noncompaction cardiomyopathy (NCCM) is a rare disorder with persistance of the embryonic pattern of myoarchitecture, and has been assumed to occur as a consequence to intrauterine arrest of compaction [1]. NCCM is characterized by loosened, spongy myocardium associated with a high incidence of systolic and diastolic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and heart failure. It is known that LV dysfunction contributes to elevated left atrial (LA) and pulmonary vascular pressures, however atrial function has not been examined in NCCM. It is difficult to assess non-invasively LA contraction, but Manning et al. reported a non-invasive method for the evaluation of LA ejection force (LAEF) as a characteristic of LA systolic function [2]. Anwar et al. demonstrated the usefulness of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) for the evaluation of LAEF [3]. The objective of the present study was to assess LAEF in NCCM patients using RT3DE and to compare to control subjects.

Methods

Patient populations

The study comprised 17 patients with an established diagnosis of NCCM and their results were compared to 17 healthy age-matched controls with no evidence of cardiovascular disease. All patients and control subjects were in sinus rhytm and all of them were examined by two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) and RT3DE.

Diagnostic criteria for NCCM

Previously proposed echocardiographic diagnostic criteria for NCCM by Jenni et al. were used to include patients into the present study from the Outpatient Clinic of Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam during 3 years [4]: (1) absence of coexisting cardiac anomalies, (2) segmental, excessive thickening of the LV wall with a two-layered structure: a thin, compacted epicardial layer and a much thicker, noncompacted layer with the characteristic appearance of numerous, prominent trabeculations (meshwork) and deep intertrabecular recesses, (3) colour Doppler evidence of deeply perfused intertrabecular recesses, and (4) predominant localization of thickening in the LV apical, midlateral, and midinferior walls. Hypertensive heart disease was excluded by clinical and echocardiographic examinations (septal thickness < 13 mm).

2DE examination

The 2DE was undertaken with the patient lying in the left lateral decubitus position using both apical and parasternal views. The 2DE studies were performed using a 3.5-MHz transducer and a commercially available ultrasound system (Sonos 7500, Philips, Best, The Netherlands). The following measures were obtained: (1) LV end-diastolic diameter (LV-EDD) and LV end-systolic diameter (LV-ESD) by M-mode echocardiography; (2) LV fractional shortening (LV-FS); (3) peak velocities of transmitral E and A waves with pulsed Doppler and (4) mitral regurgitation graded as mild (jet area < 4 cm2), moderate (jet area 4–8 cm2), and severe (jet area > 8 cm2) according to maximum jet area by color Doppler.

RT3DE examination

RT3DE was performed using the same ultrasound system, and performed with a X-4 matrix transducer capable of providing real-time B-mode and colour Doppler. The 3D images were collected within 5–7 s of breath holding in full-volume mode. The 3D data were transferred to an offline analysis system (TomTec Inc., Munich, Germany). Data were stored digitally and subsequently evaluated by two echocardiographers. Data analysis of RT3DE imaging was based on a two-dimensional approach relying on the echocardiographic images obtained from the apical views and on manual tracing of inner border of the mitral annulus (MA). Once this was completed the surface area was automatically delineated and could be visualized from different points of views. Manual modification was done to correct any image if necessary. The following measures were obtained: (1) MA diameter (MAD3D) and area (MAA3D) measured at end-diastole (just before mitral valve closure) and (2) LAEF3D-MAD and LAEF3D-MAA calculated by formula as 0.5 × 1.06 × (MAD3D or MAA3D) × V2, where V is the peak velocity of A wave, 1.06 gm/cm3 is blood viscosity and 0.5 is a coefficient factor [2] (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Automatically cropped two-dimensional image from real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic dataset demonstrating left ventricular cavity in a patient with noncompaction cardiomyopathy (A). Measurement of mitral annulus area and mitral inflow A wave velocity can help calculation of left atrial ejection force as a characteristic of atrial systole. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography allows the `en-face` evaluation of mitral annulus helping exact measurement of mitral annulus diameter and area (B). Abbreviations: MA: mitral annulus, MAD: mitral annulus diameter, E and A: mitral inflow E and A wave velocity measured by pulsed Doppler

Automatically cropped two-dimensional image from real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic dataset demonstrating left ventricular cavity in a patient with noncompaction cardiomyopathy (A). Measurement of mitral annulus area and mitral inflow A wave velocity can help calculation of left atrial ejection force as a characteristic of atrial systole. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography allows the `en-face` evaluation of mitral annulus helping exact measurement of mitral annulus diameter and area (B). Abbreviations: MA: mitral annulus, MAD: mitral annulus diameter, E and A: mitral inflow E and A wave velocity measured by pulsed Doppler

Statistical analysis

All data obtained by 2DE or RT3DE were presented as mean ± SD. Data analysis was performed using statistical software (SPSS, Version 12.1, SPSS Inc, Chicago, USA). Independent sample t test was performed to compare between means of variables of groups to determine the statistical significance of difference. The level of significance was set to p < 0.05. In our department, an excellent correlation (r = 0.82, P < 0.0001) has been described between MAD3D and MRI measurements of MAD [5]. There was no significant difference between MAD3D and MADMRI. Similarly, there was no difference between MAA3D and MAAMRI.

Results

Clinical and 2D echocardiographic data

Clinical and echocardiographic data of NCCM patients and controls are shown in Tables 1 and 2. The presence and severity of mitral regurgitation were more frequent in NCCM patients than in control subjects. LV diameters were significantly increased, while LV-FS was significantly decreased in NCCM patients. The number of noncompacted segments was 5.4 ± 2.9 in NCCM patients, which did not show any correlation with any echocardiographic parameters.
Table 1

Demographic and clinical data

ParameterNCCM patients (n = 17)Controls (n = 17)
Age (years)48 ± 2043 ± 10
Male sex (%)8 (47)11 (65)
Diabetes mellitus (%)9 (53)10 (59)
Hypercholesterolaemia (%)10 (59)11 (65)
NYHA-class II/III HF (%)3 (18)/4 (24)0 (0)

Abbreviations: NCCM: noncompaction cardiomyopathy, NYHA-class II/III HF: New York Heart Association functional class II/III heart failure

Table 2

Echocardiographic data

ParameterNCCM patients (n = 17)Controls (n = 17)
2D echocardiography
    LV-EDD (mm)60.6 ± 11.0 **51.2 ± 6.6
    LV-ESD (mm)48.1 ± 13.0 **33.0 ± 6.7
    LV-FS (%)22.1 ± 17.1 **35.7 ± 6.4
    Mitral inflow A wave velocity (cm/s)50.1 ± 16.2 *41.8 ± 9.2
Mitral regurgitation
    No8 (47) *15 (88)
    Mild6 (35) *2 (12)
    Moderate-severe3 (18) *0 (0)
RT3DE examination
    MAD3D (cm)3.5 ± 0.5 *3.2 ± 0.3
    MAA3D (cm2)12.0 ± 2.8 *7.9 ± 1.4
    LA-EF3D-MAD (kdyne)3.8 ± 2.2 *2.3 ± 1.0
    LA-EF3D-MAA (kdyne)12.7 ± 7.6 **4.9 ± 2.1

* P < 0.05 vs controls

**P < 0.01 vs controls

Abbreviations: 2D: two-dimensional, 3D: three-dimensional, A: mitral inflow A wave velocity measured by pulsed Doppler, D: diastolic, EDD: enddiastolic diameter, ESD: endsystolic diameter, FS: fractional shortening, NYHA-class II/III HF: New York Heart Association functional class II/III heart failure, LA-EF: left atrial ejection force, LV: left ventricular, MAA: mitral annulus area, MAD: mitral annulus diameter, NCCM: noncompaction cardiomyopathy

Demographic and clinical data Abbreviations: NCCM: noncompaction cardiomyopathy, NYHA-class II/III HF: New York Heart Association functional class II/III heart failure Echocardiographic data * P < 0.05 vs controls **P < 0.01 vs controls Abbreviations: 2D: two-dimensional, 3D: three-dimensional, A: mitral inflow A wave velocity measured by pulsed Doppler, D: diastolic, EDD: enddiastolic diameter, ESD: endsystolic diameter, FS: fractional shortening, NYHA-class II/III HF: New York Heart Association functional class II/III heart failure, LA-EF: left atrial ejection force, LV: left ventricular, MAA: mitral annulus area, MAD: mitral annulus diameter, NCCM: noncompaction cardiomyopathy

RT3DE data

Acquisition and postprocessing of RT3DE data were performed successfully with clear delineation of the MA in all patients. Compared with control subjects, MAD3D and MAA3D were significantly larger, while LAEF3D-MAD and LAEF3D-MAA were significantly increased in NCCM patients (P < 0.05) (Table 2).

Discussion

Left atrial ejection force (LAEF), based on classic Newtonian mechanics, provides a physiological assessment of atrial systolic function and is a potentially useful index for assessing atrial contribution to diastolic performance. To the best of authors` knowledge this is the first time to demonstrate increased LAEF during RT3DE indicating high LA workload in NCCM patients. NCCM is known to be a relatively new clinicopathologic entity characterized by a pattern of prominent trabecular meshwork and deep intertrabecular recesses communicating with the LV cavity [1]. Results of recent studies confirmed the hypothesis that isolated ventricular noncompaction can be a part of a more widespread cardiomyopathy, involving both the morphologically normal and dysmorphic LV myocardial segments [6-9]. However, the pathophysiological mechanisms of LV dysfunction remained unclear and, moreover little is known about LA function in NCCM. Manning et al. surmised that LAEF is equal to left ejection volume times acceleration of LA flow according to Newton’s law of motion (force equals mass times acceleration) [2]. Anwar et al. confirmed that RT3DE is a useful method for the evaluation of LAEF3D-MAA [3]. In recent studies MAA3D has been confirmed to be traced successfully with good interobserver agreement and comparable to magnetic resonance imaging [5]. RT3DE allowed exact ‘en-face’ measurement of MAA3D suggesting overstretching and dilatation in dilated [10], hypertrophic [3, 10] and noncompaction cardiomyopathy (present study). LAEF was higher in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients compared with control subjects, with the highest value found in patients with obstructive HCM due to higher LV resistance [3]. LAEF3D-MAA calculated by the MAA3D-derived formula was higher in HCM patients than by the ‘mitral valve area’-derived formula either by 2D echocardiography or RT3DE [3]. In the present study, 41% of NCCM patients were in NYHA functional class II / III HF. Recently, Triposkiadis et al. demonstrated that in patients with HF, LAEF and LA kinetic energy are higher than in normal controls [11]. This is most likely due to LA dilation, which compensates for the depressed LA systolic shortening and increases LA active emptying volume and LA contribution to LV stroke volume, maintaining LV stroke volume and cardiac output [11, 12]. However, it should be noted that other authors found decreased LA kinetic energy in patients with advanced HF (NYHA functional class III HF) [13, 14]. It has been concluded that LA systolic failure contributes to the transition from moderate to advanced HF.

Limitations

During evaluation of LA systolic function, consideration of other factors affecting LAEF is important. According to recent findings, age considerably influences LAEF [15]. This fact could also affect our results, but no significant differences were found in age between NCCM patients and controls. LA systolic function is deteriorated in patients with sick sinus syndrome and in those with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation [16]. However, all of our patients were in sinus rhythm. Cioffi et al. demonstrated that LV geometry can also influence LA size and function [17]. The concentric LV pattern was associated with the greatest LA volumes and with the strongest LAEF, suggesting that chronic pressure overload more than volume overload stimulates the LA in increasing its workload. Left atrial dilation can be resulted from chronic mitral regurgitation, which can also affect LA systolic function. Another important limitation is that left atrial contraction produces both the forward blood flow toward the LV through the mitral valve and backward flow towards the pulmonary veins. Unfortunately, only the forward blood flow was examined during the present study.

Conclusions

LAEF is increased in NCCM patients compared to normal individuals. These results can suggest compensating left atrial work against the dysfunctional LV in NCCM patients. However, further studies are warranted evaluating LA function by RT3DE in patients with different stages of NCCM.
  17 in total

1.  True mitral annulus diameter is underestimated by two-dimensional echocardiography as evidenced by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ashraf M Anwar; Osama I I Soliman; Folkert J ten Cate; Attila Nemes; Jackie S McGhie; Boudewijn J Krenning; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Tjebbe W Galema; Marcel L Geleijnse
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Assessment of left atrial ejection force in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  Ashraf M Anwar; Osama I I Soliman; Marcel L Geleijnse; Michelle Michels; Wim B Vletter; Attila Nemes; Folkert J ten Cate
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.251

3.  Left atrial energy in normal subjects, in patients with symptomatic mitral stenosis, and in patients with advanced heart failure.

Authors:  C Stefanadis; J Dernellis; S Lambrou; P Toutouzas
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  [Atrial ejection force. Findings in healthy subjects].

Authors:  A V Mattioli; E Tarabini Castellani; D Vivoli; R Molinari; G Mattioli
Journal:  Cardiologia       Date:  1995-05

5.  Atrial ejection force: a noninvasive assessment of atrial systolic function.

Authors:  W J Manning; D I Silverman; S E Katz; P S Douglas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Paradoxical contributions of non-compacted and compacted segments to global left ventricular dysfunction in isolated left ventricular noncompaction.

Authors:  Carla Lofiego; Elena Biagini; Marinella Ferlito; Ferdinando Pasquale; Guido Rocchi; Enrica Perugini; Ornella Leone; Giovanni Bracchetti; Kadir Caliskan; Angelo Branzi; Folkert J ten Cate; Claudio Rapezzi
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-01-09       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Echocardiographic assessment of left atrial ejection force and kinetic energy in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Filippos Triposkiadis; Christos Harbas; George Sitafidis; John Skoularigis; Vassilios Demopoulos; Glafkos Kelepeshis
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Assessment of mitral annulus size and function by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography in cardiomyopathy: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ashraf M Anwar; Osama I I Soliman; Attila Nemes; Tjeerd Germans; Boudewijn J Krenning; Marcel L Geleijnse; Albert C Van Rossum; Folkert J ten Cate
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 5.251

9.  Influence of atrial systole on the Frank-Starling relation and the end-diastolic pressure-diameter relation of the left ventricle.

Authors:  T Linderer; K Chatterjee; W W Parmley; R E Sievers; S A Glantz; J V Tyberg
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Isolated noncompaction of left ventricular myocardium. A study of eight cases.

Authors:  T K Chin; J K Perloff; R G Williams; K Jue; R Mohrmann
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Left ventricular non-compaction and its cardiac and neurologic implications.

Authors:  Josef Finsterer
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Tricuspid Annular Abnormalities in Isolated Left Ventricular Non-compaction-Insights From the Three-dimensional Speckle-Tracking Echocardiographic MAGYAR-Path Study.

Authors:  Attila Nemes; Gergely Rácz; Árpád Kormányos
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-25

Review 3.  Cardiogenetics, neurogenetics, and pathogenetics of left ventricular hypertrabeculation/noncompaction.

Authors:  Josef Finsterer
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Left Atrial Ejection Force as a Marker for the Diagnosis of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Mohamed Saber Hafez; Ahmed Mohamed El Missiri
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Echogr       Date:  2021-10-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.