Literature DB >> 17849056

Venous thromboembolism in patients with active cancer.

Ali Seddighzadeh1, Ranjith Shetty, Samuel Z Goldhaber.   

Abstract

Patients with cancer have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). To further define the demographics, comorbidities, and risk factors of VTE in these patients, we analyzed a prospective registry of 5,451 patients with ultrasound confirmed deep vein thrombosis (DVT) from 183 hospitals in the United States. Cancer was reported in 1,768 (39%), of whom 1,096 (62.0%) had active cancer. Of these, 599 (54.7%) were receiving chemotherapy, and 226 (20.6%) had metastases. Lung (18.5%), colorectal (11.8%), and breast cancer (9.0%) were among the most common cancer types. Cancer patients were younger (median age 66 years vs. 70 years; p < 0.0001), were more likely to be male (50.4% vs. 44.5%; p = 0.0005), and had a lower average body mass index (26.6 kg/m(2) vs. 28.9 kg/m(2); p < 0.0001). Cancer patients less often received VTE prophylaxis prior to development of DVT compared to those with no cancer (308 of 1,096, 28.2% vs. 1,196 of 3,444, 34.6%; p < 0.0001). For DVT therapy, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) as monotherapy without warfarin (142 of 1,086, 13.1% vs. 300 of 3,429, 8.7%; p < 0.0001) and inferior vena caval filters (234 of 1,086, 21.5% vs. 473 of 3,429, 13.8%; p < 0.0001) were utilized more often in cancer patients than in DVT patients without cancer. Cancer patients with DVT and neurological disease were twice as likely to receive inferior vena caval filters than those with no cancer (odds ratio 2.17, p = 0.005). In conclusion, cancer patients who develop DVT receive prophylaxis less often and more often receive filters than patients with no cancer who develop DVT. Future studies should focus on ways to improve implementation of prophylaxis in cancer patients and to further define the indications, efficacy, and safety of inferior vena caval filters in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17849056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  15 in total

Review 1.  Thrombosis and cancer.

Authors:  Annie Young; Oliver Chapman; Carole Connor; Christopher Poole; Peter Rose; Ajay K Kakkar
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Cancer, clots and consensus: new understanding of an old problem.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; Alok A Khorana
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Carbohydrate antigens as potential biomarkers for the malignancy in patients with idiopathic deep venous thrombosis: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Miao Yu; Yun-Hong Wang; Ahmed M E Abdalla; Wen-Qi Liu; Fei Mei; Jian Wang; Chen-Xi Ouyang; Yi-Qing Li
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2014-10-16

4.  Early diagnosis of venous thromboembolism as a clinical primary symptom of occult cancer: Core proteins of a venous thrombus.

Authors:  Siwan Wen; Qianglin Duan; Fan Yang; Guiyuan Li; Lemin Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Complications associated with erythropoietin-stimulating agents in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare study.

Authors:  Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Hui Zhao; Shenying Fang; Tomasz P Srokowski; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Sharon H Giordano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Venous thromboembolism is a product in proliferation of cancer cells.

Authors:  Le-Min Wang; Qiang-Lin Duan; Xiang-Hua Yi; Yu Zeng; Zhu Gong; Fan Yang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-05-15

7.  Venous thromboembolic events in hospitalised medical patients.

Authors:  Gregory Piazza; John Fanikos; Maksim Zayaruzny; Samuel Z Goldhaber
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 8.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with cancer.

Authors:  Charles W Francis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  The potential benefits of low-molecular-weight heparins in cancer patients.

Authors:  Francisco Robert
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 17.388

10.  A phase II experience with neoadjuvant irinotecan (CPT-11), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) for colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Oliver F Bathe; Scott Ernst; Francis R Sutherland; Elijah Dixon; Charles Butts; David Bigam; David Holland; Geoffrey A Porter; Jennifer Koppel; Scot Dowden
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.