Literature DB >> 17848841

Efficacy and safety of a new ready-to-use recombinant human growth hormone solution.

T Romer1, F Peter, P Saenger, J Starzyk, B Koehler, E Korman, M Walczak, R Wasik, M Ginalska-Malinowska, E Solyom, A Berghout.   

Abstract

We report 24-month interim results of two multicenter phase III studies in previously untreated children with growth failure secondary to GH deficiency (GHD) that were paramount to the development of a new recombinant human GH (rh- GH, somatropin), approved as the first 'biosimilar' in Europe. Study 1 consisted of 3 parts performed in 89 children. The objective was to compare efficacy and safety of the lyophilized formulation of the new somatropin [Somatropin Powder (Sandoz)] with a licensed reference rhGH preparation and the liquid formulation of the new somatropin [Somatropin Solution (Sandoz)] and to assess long-term efficacy and safety of this ready-to-use Somatropin Solution. Study 2 was performed in 51 children and designed to demonstrate efficacy and safety of Somatropin Powder and to confirm its low immunogenic potential; rhGH was given sc at a daily dose of 0.03 mg/kg. Primary [body height, height SD score (HSDS), height velocity, and height velocity (HV) SD score (HVSDS)] and secondary [IGF-I and IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3)] efficacy endpoints and safety parameters were assessed regularly. In study 1, all treatments showed comparable increases in growth. The baseline-adjusted difference between Somatropin Powder and the reference rhGH product in mean HV was -0.20 cm/yr (95% confidence interval (CI) [-1.34;0.94]) and in mean HVSDS was 0.76 (95% CI [-0.57;2.10]) after 9 months. These very small differences demonstrate comparable therapeutic efficacy between the two treatments. The results of study 2 were consistent with those seen in study 1. Equivalent therapeutic efficacy and clinical comparability in terms of safety and immunogenicity between Somatropin Powder and the reference rhGH product and between Somatropin Powder and Somatropin Solution was demonstrated. The safety and immunogenicity profiles were similar and as expected from experience with rhGH preparations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17848841     DOI: 10.1007/BF03346352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest        ISSN: 0391-4097            Impact factor:   4.256


  28 in total

Review 1.  Clinical review 11: The rational use of growth hormone during childhood.

Authors:  S D Frasier; B M Lippe
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Physical growth of Swiss children from birth to 20 years of age. First Zurich longitudinal study of growth and development.

Authors:  A Prader; R H Largo; L Molinari; C Issler
Journal:  Helv Paediatr Acta Suppl       Date:  1989-06

3.  Equivalent potency and pharmacokinetics of recombinant human growth hormones with or without an N-terminal methionine.

Authors:  J A Moore; C G Rudman; N J MacLachlan; G B Fuller; B Burnett; J W Frane
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.736

4.  Multicentre clinical trial of authentic recombinant somatropin in growth hormone deficiency.

Authors:  J R Bierich
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl       Date:  1987

5.  Clinical experience with Genotropin worldwide: an update March 1987.

Authors:  R Gunnarsson; P Wilton
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl       Date:  1987

6.  Outcome of a four-year randomized study of daily versus three times weekly somatropin treatment in prepubertal naive growth hormone-deficient children. Genentech Study Group.

Authors:  M H MacGillivray; J Baptista; A Johanson
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Safety of recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid-derived growth hormone: The National Cooperative Growth Study experience.

Authors:  S L Blethen; D B Allen; D Graves; G August; T Moshang; R Rosenfeld
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 8.  Conventional and nonconventional uses of growth hormone.

Authors:  B M Lippe; J M Nakamoto
Journal:  Recent Prog Horm Res       Date:  1993

9.  Effect of long-term recombinant growth hormone therapy in children--the National Cooperative Growth Study, USA, 1985-1994.

Authors:  A W Root; S F Kemp; A C Rundle; K Dana; K M Attie
Journal:  J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.634

Review 10.  Human growth hormone.

Authors:  J S Strobl; M J Thomas
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 25.468

View more
  15 in total

1.  Biosimilar growth hormone.

Authors:  Paul Saenger
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 2.  Is the decision on the use of biosimilar growth hormone based on high quality scientific evidence? - a systematic review.

Authors:  Linda Fryklund; Martin Ritzén; Göran Bertilsson; Marianne Heibert Arnlind
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Specific Immune Response to Phospholipase B-Like 2 Protein, a Host Cell Impurity in Lebrikizumab Clinical Material.

Authors:  Saloumeh Kadkhodayan Fischer; Melissa Cheu; Kun Peng; John Lowe; James Araujo; Elaine Murray; Dana McClintock; John Matthews; Patricia Siguenza; An Song
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Characterization and comparison of commercially available TNF receptor 2-Fc fusion protein products.

Authors:  Qingqiao Tan; Qingcheng Guo; Chen Fang; Chong Wang; Bohua Li; Hao Wang; Jing Li; Yajun Guo
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 5.857

5.  Safety and Efficacy of Lonapegsomatropin in Children With Growth Hormone Deficiency: enliGHten Trial 2-Year Results.

Authors:  Aristides K Maniatis; Samuel J Casella; Ulhas M Nadgir; Paul L Hofman; Paul Saenger; Elena D Chertock; Elena M Aghajanova; Maria Korpal-Szczyrska; Elpis Vlachopapadopoulou; Oleg Malievskiy; Tetyana Chaychenko; Marco Cappa; Wenjie Song; Meng Mao; Per Holse Mygind; Alden R Smith; Steven D Chessler; Allison S Komirenko; Michael Beckert; Aimee D Shu; Paul S Thornton
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.134

6.  Effect of switching recombinant human growth hormone: Comparative analysis of phase 3 clinical data.

Authors:  Tomasz Romer; Markus Zabransky; Mieczyslaw Walczak; Mieczyslaw Szalecki; Sigrid Balser
Journal:  Biol Ther       Date:  2011-12-16

7.  Long-term safety and efficacy of Omnitrope®, a somatropin biosimilar, in children requiring growth hormone treatment: Italian interim analysis of the PATRO Children study.

Authors:  Lorenzo Iughetti; Gianluca Tornese; Maria Elisabeth Street; Flavia Napoli; Claudia Giavoli; Franco Antoniazzi; Stefano Stagi; Caterina Luongo; Sara Azzolini; Letizia Ragusa; Gianni Bona; Clara Zecchino; Tommaso Aversa; Luca Persani; Laura Guazzarotti; Emiliano Zecchi; Alberto Pietropoli; Stefano Zucchini
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.638

8.  Current status of biosimilar growth hormone.

Authors:  Paul Saenger
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Endocrinol       Date:  2009-09-29

9.  Update on the safety and bioequivalence of biosimilars - focus on enoxaparin.

Authors:  Walter Jeske; Jeanine M Walenga; Debra Hoppensteadt; Jawed Fareed
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2013-06-10

10.  Switching to Omnitrope(®) from Other Recombinant Human Growth Hormone Therapies: A Retrospective Study in an Integrated Healthcare System.

Authors:  Nazia Rashid; Paul Saenger; Yi-Lin Wu; Heike Woehling; Matthew Frankel; Fima Lifshitz; Michael Muenzberg; Robert Rapaport
Journal:  Biol Ther       Date:  2014-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.