Literature DB >> 17848575

Unique hydrophobic extension of the RGS2 amphipathic helix domain imparts increased plasma membrane binding and function relative to other RGS R4/B subfamily members.

Steven Gu1, Janet He, Wing-Ting Ho, Suneela Ramineni, David M Thal, Ramanathan Natesh, John J G Tesmer, John R Hepler, Scott P Heximer.   

Abstract

RGS2 and RGS5 are inhibitors of G-protein signaling belonging to the R4/B subfamily of RGS proteins. We here show that RGS2 is a much more potent attenuator of M1 muscarinic receptor signaling than RGS5. We hypothesize that this difference is mediated by variation in their ability to constitutively associate with the plasma membrane (PM). Compared with full-length RGS2, the RGS-box domains of RGS2 and RGS5 both show reduced PM association and activity. Prenylation of both RGS-box domains increases activity to RGS2 levels, demonstrating that lipid bilayer targeting increases RGS domain function. Amino-terminal domain swaps confirm that key determinants of localization and function are found within this important regulatory domain. An RGS2 amphipathic helix domain mutant deficient for phospholipid binding (L45D) shows reduced PM association and activity despite normal binding to the M1 muscarinic receptor third intracellular loop and activated Galpha(q). Replacement of a unique dileucine motif adjacent to the RGS2 helix with corresponding RGS5 residues disrupts both PM localization and function. These data suggest that RGS2 contains a hydrophobic extension of its helical domain that imparts high efficiency binding to the inner leaflet of the lipid bilayer. In support of this model, disruption of membrane phospholipid composition with N-ethylmaleimide reduces PM association of RGS2, without affecting localization of the M1 receptor or Galpha(q). Together, these data indicate that novel features within the RGS2 amphipathic alpha helix facilitate constitutive PM targeting and more efficient inhibition of M1 muscarinic receptor signaling than RGS5 and other members of the R4/B subfamily.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17848575     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M702685200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  18 in total

1.  Allosteric inhibition of the regulator of G protein signaling-Galpha protein-protein interaction by CCG-4986.

Authors:  David L Roman; Levi L Blazer; C Aaron Monroy; Richard R Neubig
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 2.  A finer tuning of G-protein signaling through regulated control of RGS proteins.

Authors:  Jacob Kach; Nan Sethakorn; Nickolai O Dulin
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  A conserved hydrophobic surface of the LARG pleckstrin homology domain is critical for RhoA activation in cells.

Authors:  Mohamed Aittaleb; Guang Gao; Chris R Evelyn; Richard R Neubig; John J G Tesmer
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 4.315

4.  Structural and functional analysis of the regulator of G protein signaling 2-gαq complex.

Authors:  Mark R Nance; Barry Kreutz; Valerie M Tesmer; Rachel Sterne-Marr; Tohru Kozasa; John J G Tesmer
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 5.  Genetic Analysis of Rare Human Variants of Regulators of G Protein Signaling Proteins and Their Role in Human Physiology and Disease.

Authors:  Katherine E Squires; Carolina Montañez-Miranda; Rushika R Pandya; Matthew P Torres; John R Hepler
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 6.  Strike a pose: Gαq complexes at the membrane.

Authors:  Angeline M Lyon; Veronica G Taylor; John J G Tesmer
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 14.819

7.  Brain RGS4 and RGS10 protein expression in schizophrenia and depression. Effect of drug treatment.

Authors:  G Rivero; A M Gabilondo; J A García-Sevilla; L F Callado; R La Harpe; B Morentin; J J Meana
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Functional role, mechanisms of regulation, and therapeutic potential of regulator of G protein signaling 2 in the heart.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Ulrike Mende
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 6.677

Review 9.  Lacritin and other new proteins of the lacrimal functional unit.

Authors:  Robert L McKown; Ningning Wang; Ronald W Raab; Roy Karnati; Yinghui Zhang; Patricia B Williams; Gordon W Laurie
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 3.467

10.  Assembly of high order G alpha q-effector complexes with RGS proteins.

Authors:  Aruna Shankaranarayanan; David M Thal; Valerie M Tesmer; David L Roman; Richard R Neubig; Tohru Kozasa; John J G Tesmer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.