Literature DB >> 17846848

Incidence of finding residual disease for incidental gallbladder carcinoma: implications for re-resection.

Timothy M Pawlik1, Ana Luiza Gleisner, Luca Vigano, David A Kooby, Todd W Bauer, Andrea Frilling, Reid B Adams, Charles A Staley, Eduardo N Trindade, Richard D Schulick, Michael A Choti, Lorenzo Capussotti.   

Abstract

Re-resection for gallbladder carcinoma incidentally discovered after cholecystectomy is routinely advocated. However, the incidence of finding additional disease at the time of re-resection remains poorly defined. Between 1984 and 2006, 115 patients underwent re-resection at six major hepatobiliary centers for gallbladder carcinoma incidentally discovered during cholecystectomy. Data on clinicopathologic factors, operative details, TNM tumor stage, and outcome were collected and analyzed. Data on the incidence and location of residual/additional carcinoma discovered at the time of re-resection were also recorded. On pathologic analysis, T stage was T1 7.8%, T2 67.0%, and T3 25.2%. The median time from cholecystectomy to re-resection was 52 days. At the time of re-resection, hepatic surgery most often consisted of formal segmentectomy (64.9%). Patients underwent lymphadenectomy (LND) (50.5%) or LND + common bile duct resection (43.3%). The median number of lymph nodes harvested was 3 and did not differ between LND alone (n = 3) vs LND + common duct resection (n = 3) (P = 0.35). Pathology from the re-resection specimen noted residual/additional disease in 46.4% of patients. Of those patients staged as T1, T2, or T3, 0, 10.4, and 36.4%, respectively, had residual disease within the liver (P = 0.01). T stage was also associated with the risk of metastasis to locoregional lymph nodes (lymph node metastasis: T1 12.5%; T2 31.3%, T3 45.5%; P = 0.04). Cystic duct margin status predicted residual disease in the common bile duct (negative cystic duct, 4.3% vs positive cystic duct, 42.1%) (P = 0.01). Aggressive re-resection for incidental gallbladder carcinoma is warranted as the majority of patients have residual disease. Although common duct resection does not yield a greater lymph node count, it should be performed at the time of re-resection for patients with positive cystic duct margins because over one-third will have residual disease in the common bile duct.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17846848     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0309-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  29 in total

1.  Carcinoma of the gallbladder.

Authors:  B THORBJARNARSON; F GLENN
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1959 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Surgical treatment for metastatic malignancies. Anatomical resection of liver metastasis: indications and outcomes.

Authors:  Kenzo Yasui; Yasuhiro Shimizu
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Gallbladder carcinoma discovered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: aggressive reresection is beneficial.

Authors:  Y Fong; N Heffernan; L H Blumgart
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Radical surgery for gallbladder cancer: a worthwhile operation?

Authors:  A Muratore; R Polastri; H Bouzari; V Vergara; L Capussotti
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.424

5.  Should the bile duct be preserved or removed in radical surgery for gallbladder cancer?

Authors:  T Kosuge; K Sano; K Shimada; J Yamamoto; S Yamasaki; M Makuuchi
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug

6.  Gallbladder cancer: Defining the indications for primary radical resection and radical re-resection.

Authors:  Jason M Foster; Hisakazu Hoshi; John F Gibbs; Renuka Iyer; Miland Javle; Quyen Chu; Boris Kuvshinoff
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-11-11       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 7.  Long-term results after resection for gallbladder cancer. Implications for staging and management.

Authors:  D L Bartlett; Y Fong; J G Fortner; M F Brennan; L H Blumgart
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Primary carcinoma of the gallbladder.

Authors:  J M Piehler; R W Crichlow
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1978-12

9.  Cancer statistics, 2006.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Taylor Murray; Jiaquan Xu; Carol Smigal; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Carcinoma of the gallbladder: an appraisal of surgical resection.

Authors:  K Chijiiwa; M Tanaka
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  88 in total

Review 1.  Gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Mislav Rakić; Leonardo Patrlj; Mario Kopljar; Robert Kliček; Marijan Kolovrat; Bozo Loncar; Zeljko Busic
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Relevance of residual disease after liver resection for incidental gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Javier C Lendoire; Luis Gil; Fernando Duek; Carlos Quarin; Verónica Garay; Gabriel Raffin; Marcelo Rivaldi; Oks Alejandra; Oscar Imventarza
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Implications of the index cholecystectomy and timing of referral for radical resection of advanced incidental gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  T Tsirlis; F Ausania; S A White; J J French; B C Jaques; R M Charnley; D M Manas
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Unexpected identification of gallbladder carcinoma during cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  What to do when the pathology from last week's laparoscopic cholecystectomy is malignant and T1 or T2.

Authors:  K M Hardiman; B C Sheppard
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Extent of resection for T2N0 gallbladder carcinoma regarding concurrent extrahepatic bile duct resection.

Authors:  Sung-Chan Gwark; Shin Hwang; Ki-Hun Kim; Yong-Joo Lee; Kwang-Min Park; Chul-Soo Ahn; Deok-Bog Moon; Tae-Yong Ha; Gi-Won Song; Dong-Hwan Jung; Gil-Chun Park; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2012-11-30

7.  Incidental Gallbladder Cancer on Cholecystectomy: Strategy for Re-resection of Presumed Benign Diseases from a Retrospective Multicenter Study by the Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group.

Authors:  Ryusei Matsuyama; Kenichi Matsuo; Ryutaro Mori; Mitsutaka Sugita; Naotaka Yamaguchi; Toru Kubota; Kunio Kameda; Yasuhisa Mochizuki; Ryo Takagawa; Toshiaki Kadokura; Goro Matsuda; Noriyuki Kamiya; Itaru Endo
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 8.  Modern perspectives on factors predisposing to the development of gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Charles H C Pilgrim; Ryan T Groeschl; Kathleen K Christians; T Clark Gamblin
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Incidental pT2-T3 gallbladder cancer after a cholecystectomy: outcome of staging at 3 months prior to a radical resection.

Authors:  Fabio Ausania; Theodoris Tsirlis; Steven A White; Jeremy J French; Bryon C Jaques; Richard M Charnley; Derek M Manas
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Assessing the impact of common bile duct resection in the surgical management of gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Faiz Gani; Stefan Buettner; Georgios A Margonis; Cecilia G Ethun; George Poultsides; Thuy Tran; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A Isom; Ryan C Fields; Bradley Krasnick; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Robert C G Martin; Charles Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp D Mogal; Carl Schmidt; Eliza Beal; Ioannis Hatzaras; Rivfka Shenoy; Shishir K Maithel; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.