Literature DB >> 17846559

Low sensitivity of total lymphocyte count as a surrogate marker to identify antepartum and postpartum Indian women who require antiretroviral therapy.

Amita Gupta1, Nikhil Gupte, Ramesh Bhosale, Arjun Kakrani, Vandana Kulkarni, Uma Nayak, Madhuri Thakar, Jayagowri Sastry, Robert C Bollinger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some studies support the use of total lymphocyte count (TLC) as a surrogate marker for CD4 cell count to guide antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation. However, most of these studies have focused on nonpregnant adults. In light of expanding ART access through prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT)-plus programs in resource-limited settings, we assessed the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of TLC for predicting low CD4 counts in antepartum and postpartum women in Pune, India.
METHODS: CD4, TLC, and hemoglobin were measured at third trimester, delivery, and 6, 9, and 12 months postpartum (PP) in a cohort of 779 HIV-infected women. Optimal TLC cutoff for predicting CD4 <200 cells/mm3 was determined via logistic regression where sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were calculated.
RESULTS: Among the 779 women enrolled, 16% had WHO clinical stage 2 or higher and 7.9% had CD4 <200 cells/mm3. Using 2689 TLC-CD4 pairs, the sensitivity, specificity, and PPV of TLC <1200 cells/mm3 for predicting CD4 <200 cells/mm3 was 59%, 94%, and 47%, respectively. The sensitivity of TLC <1200 cells/mm3 cutoff ranged between 57% and 62% for time points evaluated. Addition of hemoglobin <12 g/dL or <11 g/dL increased the sensitivity of TLC to 74% to 92% for predicting CD4 <200 cells/mm3 but decreased the specificity to 33% to 69% compared to TLC alone. A combination of TLC, hemoglobin, and WHO clinical staging had the highest sensitivity but lowest specificity compared to other possible combinations or use of TLC alone. The sensitivity and specificity of TLC <1200 cells/mm3 to predict a CD4 <350 cells/mm3 was 31% and 99%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that antepartum and PP women with TLC <1200 cells/mm3 are likely to have CD4 <200 cells/mm3. However, the sensitivity of this TLC cutoff was low. Between 45% and 64% of antepartum and PP women requiring initiation of ART may not be identified by using TLC alone as a surrogate marker for CD4 <200 cells/mm3. The WHO-recommended TLC cutoff of <1200 cells/mm3 is not optimal for identifying antepartum and PP Indian women who require ART.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17846559     DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318157684b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr        ISSN: 1525-4135            Impact factor:   3.731


  11 in total

1.  Correlation analysis on total lymphocyte count and CD4 count in HIV-infected patients: a retrospective evaluation.

Authors:  Yuming Wang; Shuying Liang; Erman Yu; Jinling Guo; Zizhao Li; Zhe Wang; Yukai Du
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2011-10-25

2.  Utility of absolute lymphocyte count as a surrogate marker of CD4 cell counts: Is it useful?

Authors:  Amitabh Sagar; Abhishek Pathak; Vikas Ambiya; Nardeep Naithani; Biju Vasudevan; Sunil Agrawal
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2013-08-06

3.  Correlation of CD4+ T cell Count with Total Lymphocyte Count, Haemoglobin and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate Levels in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type-1 Disease.

Authors:  Sourav Sen; Akshat Vyas; Sunil Sanghi; K Shanmuganandan; R M Gupta; Brig Ketoki Kapila; A K Praharaj; Satish Kumar; R B Batra
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

4.  Comparison of CD4 cell count, viral load, and other markers for the prediction of mortality among HIV-1-infected Kenyan pregnant women.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Brown; Phelgona Otieno; Dorothy A Mbori-Ngacha; Carey Farquhar; Elizabeth M Obimbo; Ruth Nduati; Julie Overbaugh; Grace C John-Stewart
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Prioritizing CD4 count monitoring in response to ART in resource-constrained settings: a retrospective application of prediction-based classification.

Authors:  Livio Azzoni; Andrea S Foulkes; Yan Liu; Xiaohong Li; Margaret Johnson; Collette Smith; Adeeba Bte Kamarulzaman; Julio Montaner; Karam Mounzer; Michael Saag; Pedro Cahn; Carina Cesar; Alejandro Krolewiecki; Ian Sanne; Luis J Montaner
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Absolute lymphocyte count is not a suitable alternative to CD4 count for determining initiation of antiretroviral therapy in fiji.

Authors:  Dashika A Balak; Karen Bissell; Christine Roseveare; Sharan Ram; Rachel R Devi; Stephen M Graham
Journal:  J Trop Med       Date:  2014-10-27

7.  Is total lymphocyte count a predictor for CD4 cell count in initiation antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients?

Authors:  Alireza Abdollahi; Hana Saffar; Saeed Shoar; Siroos Jafari
Journal:  Niger Med J       Date:  2014-07

8.  Relationship between total lymphocyte count (TLC) and CD4 count among peoples living with HIV, Southern Ethiopia: a retrospective evaluation.

Authors:  Deresse Daka; Eskindir Loha
Journal:  AIDS Res Ther       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.250

9.  Total Lymphocyte Count as surrogate marker for CD4 Cell Count in HIV-Infected Individuals in Gondar University Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Yitayih Wondimeneh; Getachew Ferede; Gizachew Yismaw; Dagnachew Muluye
Journal:  AIDS Res Ther       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 2.250

10.  Evaluating total lymphocyte count as a surrogate marker for CD4 cell count in the management of HIV-infected patients in resource-limited settings: a study from China.

Authors:  Jieqing Chen; Wei Li; Xiaojie Huang; Caiping Guo; Ran Zou; Qiuying Yang; Hongwei Zhang; Tong Zhang; Hui Chen; Hao Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.