BACKGROUND: Autograft regurgitation and root dilatation after the Ross procedure is of major concern. We reviewed data from the German Ross Registry to document the development of autograft regurgitation and root dilatation with time and also to compare 2 different techniques of autograft implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 1990 and 2006 1014 patients (786 men, 228 women; mean age 41.2+/-15.3 years) underwent the Ross procedure using 2 different implantation techniques (subcoronary, n=521; root replacement, n=493). Clinical and serial echocardiographic follow up was performed preoperatively and thereafter annually (mean follow up 4.41+/-3.11 years, median 3.93 years, range 0 to 16.04 years; 5012 patient-years). For statistical analysis of serial echocardiograms, a hierarchical multilevel modeling technique was applied. Eight early and 28 late deaths were observed. Pulmonary autograft reoperations were required in 35 patients. Initial autograft regurgitation grade was 0.49 (root replacement 0.73, subcoronary 0.38) with an annual increase of grade 0.034 (root replacement 0.0259, subcoronary 0.0231). Annulus and sinus dimensions did not exhibit an essential increase over time in both techniques, whereas sinotubular junction diameter increased essentially by 0.5 mm per year in patients with root replacement. Patients with the subcoronary implantation technique showed nearly unchanged dimensions. Bicuspid aortic valve morphology did not have any consistent impact on root dimensions with time irrespective of the performed surgical technique. CONCLUSIONS: The present Ross series from the German Ross Registry showed favorable clinical and hemodynamic results. Development of autograft regurgitation for both techniques was small and the annual progression thereof is currently not substantial. Use of the subcoronary technique and aortic root interventions with stabilizing measures in root replacement patients seem to prevent autograft regurgitation and dilatation of the aortic root within the timeframe studied.
BACKGROUND: Autograft regurgitation and root dilatation after the Ross procedure is of major concern. We reviewed data from the German Ross Registry to document the development of autograft regurgitation and root dilatation with time and also to compare 2 different techniques of autograft implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 1990 and 2006 1014 patients (786 men, 228 women; mean age 41.2+/-15.3 years) underwent the Ross procedure using 2 different implantation techniques (subcoronary, n=521; root replacement, n=493). Clinical and serial echocardiographic follow up was performed preoperatively and thereafter annually (mean follow up 4.41+/-3.11 years, median 3.93 years, range 0 to 16.04 years; 5012 patient-years). For statistical analysis of serial echocardiograms, a hierarchical multilevel modeling technique was applied. Eight early and 28 late deaths were observed. Pulmonary autograft reoperations were required in 35 patients. Initial autograft regurgitation grade was 0.49 (root replacement 0.73, subcoronary 0.38) with an annual increase of grade 0.034 (root replacement 0.0259, subcoronary 0.0231). Annulus and sinus dimensions did not exhibit an essential increase over time in both techniques, whereas sinotubular junction diameter increased essentially by 0.5 mm per year in patients with root replacement. Patients with the subcoronary implantation technique showed nearly unchanged dimensions. Bicuspid aortic valve morphology did not have any consistent impact on root dimensions with time irrespective of the performed surgical technique. CONCLUSIONS: The present Ross series from the German Ross Registry showed favorable clinical and hemodynamic results. Development of autograft regurgitation for both techniques was small and the annual progression thereof is currently not substantial. Use of the subcoronary technique and aortic root interventions with stabilizing measures in root replacement patients seem to prevent autograft regurgitation and dilatation of the aortic root within the timeframe studied.
Authors: Claudia Cattapan; Mila Della Barbera; Arben Dedja; Piero Pavan; Giovanni Di Salvo; Jolanda Sabatino; Martina Avesani; Massimo Padalino; Alvise Guariento; Cristina Basso; Vladimiro Vida Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Roel L F van der Palen; Teun van der Bom; Annika Dekker; Roula Tsonaka; Nan van Geloven; Irene M Kuipers; Thelma C Konings; Lukas A J Rammeloo; Arend D J Ten Harkel; Monique R M Jongbloed; Dave R Koolbergen; Barbara J M Mulder; Mark G Hazekamp; Nico A Blom Journal: Heart Date: 2019-07-10 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Johannes Nordmeyer; Philipp Lurz; Victor T Tsang; Louise Coats; Fiona Walker; Andrew M Taylor; Sachin Khambadkone; Marc R de Leval; Philipp Bonhoeffer Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2009-04-25 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Peter D Skillington; M Mostafa Mokhles; William Wilson; Leeanne Grigg; Marco Larobina; Michael O'Keefe; Johanna Takkenberg Journal: Glob Cardiol Sci Pract Date: 2013-12-30