OBJECTIVE: To assess whether patients receivingaerobic exercise training performed either at home or in a supervised group setting achieve reductions in depression comparable to standard antidepressant medication (sertraline) and greater reductions in depression compared to placebo controls. METHODS:Between October 2000 and November 2005, we performed a prospective, randomized controlled trial (SMILE study) with allocation concealment and blinded outcome assessment in a tertiary care teaching hospital. A total of 202 adults (153 women; 49 men) diagnosed with major depression were assigned randomly to one of four conditions: supervised exercise in a group setting; home-based exercise; antidepressant medication (sertraline, 50-200 mg daily); or placebo pill for 16 weeks. Patients underwent the structured clinical interview for depression and completed the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). RESULTS: After 4 months of treatment, 41% of the participants achieved remission, defined as no longer meeting the criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) and a HAM-D score of <8. Patients receiving active treatments tended to have higher remission rates than the placebo controls: supervised exercise = 45%; home-based exercise = 40%; medication = 47%; placebo = 31% (p = .057). All treatment groups had lower HAM-D scores after treatment; scores for the active treatment groups were not significantly different from the placebo group (p = .23). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of exercise in patients seems generally comparable with patients receiving antidepressant medication and both tend to be better than the placebo in patients with MDD. Placebo response rates were high, suggesting that a considerable portion of the therapeutic response is determined by patient expectations, ongoing symptom monitoring, attention, and other nonspecific factors.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether patients receiving aerobic exercise training performed either at home or in a supervised group setting achieve reductions in depression comparable to standard antidepressant medication (sertraline) and greater reductions in depression compared to placebo controls. METHODS: Between October 2000 and November 2005, we performed a prospective, randomized controlled trial (SMILE study) with allocation concealment and blinded outcome assessment in a tertiary care teaching hospital. A total of 202 adults (153 women; 49 men) diagnosed with major depression were assigned randomly to one of four conditions: supervised exercise in a group setting; home-based exercise; antidepressant medication (sertraline, 50-200 mg daily); or placebo pill for 16 weeks. Patients underwent the structured clinical interview for depression and completed the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). RESULTS: After 4 months of treatment, 41% of the participants achieved remission, defined as no longer meeting the criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) and a HAM-D score of <8. Patients receiving active treatments tended to have higher remission rates than the placebo controls: supervised exercise = 45%; home-based exercise = 40%; medication = 47%; placebo = 31% (p = .057). All treatment groups had lower HAM-D scores after treatment; scores for the active treatment groups were not significantly different from the placebo group (p = .23). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of exercise in patients seems generally comparable with patients receiving antidepressant medication and both tend to be better than the placebo in patients with MDD. Placebo response rates were high, suggesting that a considerable portion of the therapeutic response is determined by patient expectations, ongoing symptom monitoring, attention, and other nonspecific factors.
Authors: Madhukar H Trivedi; A John Rush; Stephen R Wisniewski; Andrew A Nierenberg; Diane Warden; Louise Ritz; Grayson Norquist; Robert H Howland; Barry Lebowitz; Patrick J McGrath; Kathy Shores-Wilson; Melanie M Biggs; G K Balasubramani; Maurizio Fava Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Patricia Berglund; Olga Demler; Robert Jin; Kathleen R Merikangas; Ellen E Walters Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2005-06
Authors: Nalin A Singh; Theodora M Stavrinos; Yvonne Scarbek; Garry Galambos; Cas Liber; Maria A Fiatarone Singh Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Andrea L Dunn; Madhukar H Trivedi; James B Kampert; Camillia G Clark; Heather O Chambliss Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Tracy L Greer; Kolette M Ring; Diane Warden; Bruce D Grannemann; Timothy S Church; Eugene Somoza; Steven N Blair; Jose Szapocznik; Mark Stoutenberg; Chad Rethorst; Robrina Walker; David W Morris; Andrzej S Kosinski; Tiffany Kyle; Bess Marcus; Becca Crowell; Neal Oden; Edward Nunes; Madhukar H Trivedi Journal: J Glob Drug Policy Pract Date: 2012
Authors: Benjamin N Greenwood; Teresa E Foley; Tony V Le; Paul V Strong; Alice B Loughridge; Heidi E W Day; Monika Fleshner Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2010-11-09 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: B M Hoffman; A Sherwood; P J Smith; M A Babyak; P M Doraiswamy; A Hinderliter; J A Blumenthal Journal: Int J Impot Res Date: 2009-09-24 Impact factor: 2.896