Literature DB >> 17846033

Bar workers' exposure to second-hand smoke: the effect of Scottish smoke-free legislation on occupational exposure.

Sean Semple1, Laura Maccalman, Audrey Atherton Naji, Scott Dempsey, Shona Hilton, Brian G Miller, Jon G Ayres.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine changes in bar workers' exposure to second-hand smoke (SHS) over a 12-month period before and after the introduction of Scottish smoke-free legislation on the 26 March 2006.
METHODS: A total of 371 bar workers were recruited from 72 bars in three cities: Aberdeen, Glasgow, Edinburgh and small towns in two rural regions (Borders and Aberdeenshire). Prior to the introduction of the smoke-free legislation, we visited all participants in their place of work and collected saliva samples, for the measurement of cotinine, together with details on work patterns, self-reported exposure to SHS at work and non-work settings and smoking history. This was repeated 2 months post-legislation and again in the spring of 2007. In addition, we gathered full-shift personal exposure data from a small number of Aberdeen bar workers using a personal aerosol monitor for fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) at the baseline and 2 months post-legislation visits.
RESULTS: Data were available for 371 participants at baseline, 266 (72%) at 2 months post-legislation and 191 (51%) at the 1-year follow-up. The salivary cotinine level recorded in non-smokers fell from a geometric mean of 2.94 ng ml(-1) prior to introduction of the legislation to 0.41 ng ml(-1) at 1-year follow-up. Paired data showed a reduction in non-smokers' cotinine levels of 89% [95% confidence interval (CI) 85-92%]. For the whole cohort, the duration of workplace exposure to SHS within the last 7 days fell from 28.5 to 0.83 h, though some bar workers continued to report substantial SHS exposures at work despite the legislation. Smokers also demonstrated reductions in their salivary cotinine levels of 12% (95% CI 3-20%). This may reflect both the reduction in SHS exposure at work and falls in active cigarette smoking in this group. In a small sub-sample of bar workers, full-shift personal exposure to PM(2.5), a marker of SHS concentrations, showed average reductions of 86% between baseline and 2 months after implementation of the legislation.
CONCLUSIONS: Most bar workers have experienced very large reductions in their workplace exposure to SHS as a result of smoke-free legislation in Scotland. These reductions have been sustained over a period of 1 year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17846033     DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mem044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  30 in total

1.  Tobacco smoke exposure in nonsmoking hospitality workers before and after a state smoking ban.

Authors:  Joni A Jensen; Barbara A Schillo; Molly M Moilanen; Bruce R Lindgren; Sharon Murphy; Steven Carmella; Stephen S Hecht; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Indoor fine particle (PM2.5) pollution exposure due to secondhand smoke in selected public places of Sri Lanka.

Authors:  Sumal Nandasena; Ananda R Wickremasinghe; Kiyoung Lee; Nalini Sathiakumar
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 3.  Smokefree legislation effects on respiratory and sensory disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yolanda Rando-Matos; Mariona Pons-Vigués; María José López; Rodrigo Córdoba; José Luis Ballve-Moreno; Elisa Puigdomènech-Puig; Vega Estíbaliz Benito-López; Olga Lucía Arias-Agudelo; Mercè López-Grau; Anna Guardia-Riera; José Manuel Trujillo; Carlos Martin-Cantera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A survey of schoolchildren's exposure to secondhand smoke in Malaysia.

Authors:  Emilia Zainal Abidin; Sean Semple; Affandi Omar; Hejar A Rahman; Stephen W Turner; Jon G Ayres
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  A cross-country comparison of secondhand smoke exposure among adults: findings from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS).

Authors:  Brian A King; Sara A Mirza; Stephen D Babb
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 6.  Recent contributions of air- and biomarkers to the control of secondhand smoke (SHS): a review.

Authors:  Jacques J Prignot
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Are there health benefits associated with comprehensive smoke-free laws.

Authors:  Patrick G Goodman; Sally Haw; Zubair Kabir; Luke Clancy
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 8.  Protecting the world from secondhand tobacco smoke exposure: where do we stand and where do we go from here?

Authors:  Joaquin Barnoya; Ana Navas-Acien
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 4.244

9.  Impact of the Spanish smoking law on exposure to second-hand smoke and respiratory health in hospitality workers: a cohort study.

Authors:  Esteve Fernández; Marcela Fu; José A Pascual; María J López; Mónica Pérez-Ríos; Anna Schiaffino; Jose M Martínez-Sánchez; Carles Ariza; Esteve Saltó; Manel Nebot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Changes in child exposure to secondhand smoke after implementation of smoke-free legislation in Wales: a repeated cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jo C Holliday; Graham F Moore; Laurence A R Moore
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.