Literature DB >> 17845297

On the stability of populations of mammals, birds, fish and insects.

Richard M Sibly1, Daniel Barker, Jim Hone, Mark Pagel.   

Abstract

A key concern for conservation biologists is whether populations of plants and animals are likely to fluctuate widely in number or remain relatively stable around some steady-state value. In our study of 634 populations of mammals, birds, fish and insects, we find that most can be expected to remain stable despite year to year fluctuations caused by environmental factors. Mean return rates were generally around one but were higher in insects (1.09 +/- 0.02 SE) and declined with body size in mammals. In general, this is good news for conservation, as stable populations are less likely to go extinct. However, the lower return rates of the large mammals may make them more vulnerable to extinction. Our estimates of return rates were generally well below the threshold for chaos, which makes it unlikely that chaotic dynamics occur in natural populations--one of ecology's key unanswered questions.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17845297     DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01092.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  18 in total

1.  Population and geographic range dynamics: implications for conservation planning.

Authors:  Georgina M Mace; Ben Collen; Richard A Fuller; Elizabeth H Boakes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Effects of weather and climate on the dynamics of animal population time series.

Authors:  Jonas Knape; Perry de Valpine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Emerging evidence of resource limitation in an Antarctic seabird metapopulation after 6 decades of sustained population growth.

Authors:  Colin Southwell; Simon Wotherspoon; Louise Emmerson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  An updated perspective on the role of environmental autocorrelation in animal populations.

Authors:  Jake M Ferguson; Felipe Carvalho; Oscar Murillo-García; Mark L Taper; José M Ponciano
Journal:  Theor Ecol       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 1.432

5.  Population stability, cooperation, and the invasibility of the human species.

Authors:  Marcus J Hamilton; Oskar Burger; John P DeLong; Robert S Walker; Melanie E Moses; James H Brown
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The effects of landscape modifications on the long-term persistence of animal populations.

Authors:  Jacob Nabe-Nielsen; Richard M Sibly; Mads C Forchhammer; Valery E Forbes; Christopher J Topping
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Experimental evidence for density-dependent responses to mortality of snake-necked turtles.

Authors:  Damien A Fordham; Arthur Georges; Barry W Brook
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  The effects of spatial and temporal heterogeneity on the population dynamics of four animal species in a Danish landscape.

Authors:  Richard M Sibly; Jacob Nabe-Nielsen; Mads C Forchhammer; Valery E Forbes; Christopher J Topping
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 2.964

9.  Strength of density feedback in census data increases from slow to fast life histories.

Authors:  Salvador Herrando-Pérez; Steven Delean; Barry W Brook; Corey J A Bradshaw
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Social familiarity governs prey patch-exploitation, -leaving and inter-patch distribution of the group-living predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis.

Authors:  Gernot J Zach; Stefan Peneder; Markus A Strodl; Peter Schausberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.