BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Parvovirus B19 (B19V) DNA screening has been introduced to comply with European regulations for certain plasma products. Current commercial and some in-house B19V DNA assays fail to detect or under-quantify the recently identified genotypes 2 and 3. In this report, we describe 2-year experience with B19V DNA screening using the commercial assay from Roche (detecting only genotype 1) combined with an in-house assay (detecting genotypes 1, 2 and 3). This dual testing approach enables the identification of molecular variants of B19V. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2005 and 2007, approximately 2.6 million plasma donations were screened for B19V DNA loads exceeding 10(6) IU/ml using the Roche and the in-house real-time polymerase chain reaction assay. RESULTS: A total of 232 plasma units were identified with B19V DNA loads above 10(6) IU/ml. Concordant results were observed for the majority of B19V positive samples; however, three of these showed discrepant results between the two assay systems. One was a B19V genotype 2 strain not detected by the Roche assay; another was a B19V genotype 1 strain with a mismatch in the 3'-end of the reverse primer and therefore under-quantified by the Roche assay; and the third one was also a B19V genotype 1 strain that gave an unusual amplification plot in the in-house assay due to a mismatch in the probe-binding site. CONCLUSIONS: New, high viral load, B19V genotypes 2 and 3 infections are rare in blood donors tested by Sanquin. One case was found while testing 2.6 million donations. The prevalence of B19V genotype 1 variants not detected by commercial or in-house assays might be in the same range or even higher than the prevalence of B19V genotype 2 viruses, which remain undetected.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Parvovirus B19 (B19V) DNA screening has been introduced to comply with European regulations for certain plasma products. Current commercial and some in-house B19V DNA assays fail to detect or under-quantify the recently identified genotypes 2 and 3. In this report, we describe 2-year experience with B19V DNA screening using the commercial assay from Roche (detecting only genotype 1) combined with an in-house assay (detecting genotypes 1, 2 and 3). This dual testing approach enables the identification of molecular variants of B19V. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2005 and 2007, approximately 2.6 million plasma donations were screened for B19V DNA loads exceeding 10(6) IU/ml using the Roche and the in-house real-time polymerase chain reaction assay. RESULTS: A total of 232 plasma units were identified with B19V DNA loads above 10(6) IU/ml. Concordant results were observed for the majority of B19V positive samples; however, three of these showed discrepant results between the two assay systems. One was a B19V genotype 2 strain not detected by the Roche assay; another was a B19V genotype 1 strain with a mismatch in the 3'-end of the reverse primer and therefore under-quantified by the Roche assay; and the third one was also a B19V genotype 1 strain that gave an unusual amplification plot in the in-house assay due to a mismatch in the probe-binding site. CONCLUSIONS: New, high viral load, B19V genotypes 2 and 3 infections are rare in blood donors tested by Sanquin. One case was found while testing 2.6 million donations. The prevalence of B19V genotype 1 variants not detected by commercial or in-house assays might be in the same range or even higher than the prevalence of B19V genotype 2 viruses, which remain undetected.
Authors: Johannes Blümel; Reinhard Burger; Christian Drosten; Albrecht Gröner; Lutz Gürtler; Margarethe Heiden; Martin Hildebrandt; Bernd Jansen; Thomas Montag-Lessing; Ruth Offergeld; Georg Pauli; Rainer Seitz; Uwe Schlenkrich; Volkmar Schottstedt; Johanna Strobel; Hannelore Willkommen; Carl-Heinz Wirsing von König Journal: Transfus Med Hemother Date: 2010-11-17 Impact factor: 3.747
Authors: Päivi Norja; Anna Maria Eis-Hübinger; Maria Söderlund-Venermo; Klaus Hedman; Peter Simmonds Journal: J Virol Date: 2008-04-16 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Gorana G Stamenković; Valentina S Ćirković; Marina M Šiljić; Jelena V Blagojević; Aleksandra M Knežević; Ivana D Joksić; Maja P Stanojević Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-10-24 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Marijke W A Molenaar-de Backer; Vladimir V Lukashov; Rob S van Binnendijk; Hein J Boot; Hans L Zaaijer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-13 Impact factor: 3.240