Literature DB >> 17838387

Biological classification: toward a synthesis of opposing methodologies.

E Mayr.   

Abstract

Currently a controversy is raging as to which of three competing methodologies of biological classification is the best: phenetics, cladistics, or evolutionary classification. The merits and seeming deficiencies of the three approaches are analyzed. Since classifying is a multiple-step procedure, it is suggested that the best components of the three methods be used at each step. By such a synthetic approach, classifications can be constructed that are equally suited as the basis of generalizations and as an index to information storage and retrieval systems.

Year:  1981        PMID: 17838387     DOI: 10.1126/science.214.4520.510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  11 in total

1.  The practice of classification and the theory of evolution, and what the demise of Charles Darwin's tree of life hypothesis means for both of them.

Authors:  W Ford Doolittle
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  At the core of the Archaea.

Authors:  W F Doolittle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Classification of Aspergillus, Penicillium, Talaromyces and related genera (Eurotiales): An overview of families, genera, subgenera, sections, series and species.

Authors:  J Houbraken; S Kocsubé; C M Visagie; N Yilmaz; X-C Wang; M Meijer; B Kraak; V Hubka; K Bensch; R A Samson; J C Frisvad
Journal:  Stud Mycol       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 16.097

4.  Relations and dependencies between morphological characters.

Authors:  Jürgen Jost
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 1.919

5.  Considering transposable element diversification in de novo annotation approaches.

Authors:  Timothée Flutre; Elodie Duprat; Catherine Feuillet; Hadi Quesneville
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  The Baltimore Classification of Viruses 50 Years Later: How Does It Stand in the Light of Virus Evolution?

Authors:  Eugene V Koonin; Mart Krupovic; Vadim I Agol
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 13.044

Review 7.  Morphological Plant Modeling: Unleashing Geometric and Topological Potential within the Plant Sciences.

Authors:  Alexander Bucksch; Acheampong Atta-Boateng; Akomian F Azihou; Dorjsuren Battogtokh; Aly Baumgartner; Brad M Binder; Siobhan A Braybrook; Cynthia Chang; Viktoirya Coneva; Thomas J DeWitt; Alexander G Fletcher; Malia A Gehan; Diego Hernan Diaz-Martinez; Lilan Hong; Anjali S Iyer-Pascuzzi; Laura L Klein; Samuel Leiboff; Mao Li; Jonathan P Lynch; Alexis Maizel; Julin N Maloof; R J Cody Markelz; Ciera C Martinez; Laura A Miller; Washington Mio; Wojtek Palubicki; Hendrik Poorter; Christophe Pradal; Charles A Price; Eetu Puttonen; John B Reese; Rubén Rellán-Álvarez; Edgar P Spalding; Erin E Sparks; Christopher N Topp; Joseph H Williams; Daniel H Chitwood
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 8.  Prokaryotic taxonomy and nomenclature in the age of big sequence data.

Authors:  Philip Hugenholtz; Maria Chuvochina; Aharon Oren; Donovan H Parks; Rochelle M Soo
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 9.  Romance of the three domains: how cladistics transformed the classification of cellular organisms.

Authors:  Chi-Chun Ho; Susanna K P Lau; Patrick C Y Woo
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 14.870

10.  Phylogenetic Classification of Seed Plants of Taiwan.

Authors:  Cheng-Tao Lin; Kuo-Fang Chung
Journal:  Bot Stud       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.787

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.