Literature DB >> 17828699

Surveillance of occupational blood and body fluid exposures among French healthcare workers in 2004.

A G Venier1, A Vincent, F L'heriteau, N Floret, H Senechal, D Abiteboul, E Reyreaud, B Coignard, P Parneix.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence rate of reported occupational blood and body fluid exposures among French healthcare workers (HCWs).
DESIGN: Prospective national follow-up of HCWs from January 1 to December 31, 2004.
SETTING: University hospitals, hospitals, clinics, local medical centers, and specialized psychiatric centers were included in the study on a voluntary basis. PARTICIPANTS: At participating medical centers, every reported blood and body fluid exposure was documented by the occupational practitioner in charge of the exposed HCW by use of an anonymous, standardized questionnaire.
RESULTS: A total of 375 medical centers (15% of French medical centers, accounting for 29% of hospital beds) reported 13,041 blood and body fluid exposures; of these, 9,396 (72.0%) were needlestick injuries. Blood and body fluid exposures were avoidable in 39.1% of cases (5,091 of 13,020), and 52.2% of percutaneous injuries (4,986 of 9,552) were avoidable (5.9% due to needle recapping). Of 10,656 percutaneous injuries, 22.6% occurred during an injection, 17.9% during blood sampling, and 16.6% during surgery. Of 2,065 splashes, 22.6% occurred during nursing activities, 19.1% during surgery, 14.1% during placement or removal of an intravenous line, and 12.0% during manipulation of a tracheotomy tube. The incidence rates of exposures were 8.9 per 100 hospital beds (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.7-9.0 exposures), 2.2 per 100 full-time-equivalent physicians (95% CI, 2.4-2.6 exposures), and 7.0 per 100 full-time-equivalent nurses (95% CI, 6.8-7.2 exposures). Human immunodeficiency virus serological status was unknown for 2,789 (21.4%) of 13,041 patients who were the source of the blood and body fluid exposures.
CONCLUSION: National surveillance networks for blood and body fluid exposures help to better document their characteristics and risk factors and can enhance prevention at participating medical centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17828699     DOI: 10.1086/520742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  4 in total

1.  Image-directed fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid with safety-engineered devices.

Authors:  Randy R Sibbitt; Dennis J Palmer; Wilmer L Sibbitt; Arthur D Bankhurst
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Time Trends of Percutaneous Injuries in Hospital Nurses: Evidence of the Interference between Effects of Adoption of Safety Devices and Organizational Factors.

Authors:  Marco M Ferrario; Giovanni Veronesi; Rossana Borchini; Marco Cavicchiolo; Oriana Dashi; Daniela Dalla Gasperina; Giovanna Martinelli; Francesco Gianfagna
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Non-Safety and Safety Device Sharp Injuries-Risk of Incidents, SEDs Availability, Attitudes and Perceptions of Nurses According to Cross-Sectional Survey in Poland.

Authors:  Anna Garus-Pakowska; Mariusz Górajski; Piotr Sakowski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 4.  How Much do Needlestick Injuries Cost? A Systematic Review of the Economic Evaluations of Needlestick and Sharps Injuries Among Healthcare Personnel.

Authors:  Alice Mannocci; Gabriella De Carli; Virginia Di Bari; Rosella Saulle; Brigid Unim; Nicola Nicolotti; Lorenzo Carbonari; Vincenzo Puro; Giuseppe La Torre
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.254

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.