Literature DB >> 17828431

Intrahepatic lymphatic invasion independently predicts poor survival and recurrences after hepatectomy in patients with colorectal carcinoma liver metastases.

Pavel V Korita1, Toshifumi Wakai, Yoshio Shirai, Jun Sakata, Kazuyasu Takizawa, Pauldion V Cruz, Yoichi Ajioka, Katsuyoshi Hatakeyama.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: D2-40 monoclonal antibody immunoreactivity is specific for lymphatic endothelium and therefore provides a marker of lymphatic invasion. We hypothesized that intrahepatic lymphatic invasion reflects the nodal status of colorectal carcinoma liver metastases and may function as an adverse prognostic factor.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 105 consecutive patients who underwent resection for colorectal carcinoma liver metastases was conducted. Intrahepatic lymphatic invasion was declared when either single tumor cells or cell clusters were clearly visible within vessels that showed immunoreactivity for D2-40 monoclonal antibody. The median follow-up time was 124 months.
RESULTS: Of 105 patients, 13 were classified as having intrahepatic lymphatic invasion. All tumor foci of intrahepatic lymphatic invasion were detected within the portal tracts. Intrahepatic lymphatic invasion was significantly associated with hepatic lymph node involvement (P = 0.039). Survival after resection was significantly worse in patients with intrahepatic lymphatic invasion (median survival time of 13 months; cumulative five-year survival rate of 0%) than in patients without (median survival time of 40 months; cumulative five-year survival rate of 41%; P < 0.0001). Patients with intrahepatic lymphatic invasion also showed decreased disease-free survival rates (P < 0.0001). Intrahepatic lymphatic invasion thus independently affected both survival (relative risk, 7.666; 95% confidence interval, 3.732-15.748; P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (relative risk, 4.112; 95% confidence interval, 2.185-7.738; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Intrahepatic lymphatic invasion is associated with hepatic lymph node involvement and is an adverse prognostic factor in patients with colorectal carcinoma liver metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17828431     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-007-9594-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  16 in total

1.  Safety analysis of the oncological outcome after vein-preserving surgery for colorectal liver metastases detached from the main hepatic veins.

Authors:  Federico Tomassini; Italo Bonadio; Peter Smeets; Karen De Paepe; Giammauro Berardi; Liesbeth Ferdinande; Stéphanie Laurent; Louis J Libbrecht; Karen Geboes; Roberto I Troisi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Prognostic impact of intrahepatic lymphatic and microvascular involvement in cases of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Maximilian Bockhorn; Georgios Sotiropoulos; Jan Neuhaus; George Sgourakis; Sien-Yi Sheu; Ernesto Molmenti; Christian Fingas; Tanja Trarbach; Andreja Frilling; Christoph E Broelsch
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Parenchymal-sparing liver surgery in patients with colorectal carcinoma liver metastases.

Authors:  Fernando A Alvarez; Rodrigo Sanchez Claria; Sebastian Oggero; Eduardo de Santibañes
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-06-27

4.  Critical review of the prognostic significance of pathological variables in patients undergoing resection for colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Dhanwant Gomez; Abed M Zaitoun; Antonella De Rosa; Sina Hossaini; Ian J Beckingham; Adam Brooks; Iain C Cameron
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Histologic evaluation of intrahepatic micrometastases in patients treated with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal carcinoma liver metastasis.

Authors:  Toshifumi Wakai; Yoshio Shirai; Jun Sakata; Hitoshi Kameyama; Hitoshi Nogami; Tsuneo Iiai; Yoichi Ajioka; Katsuyoshi Hatakeyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2012-04-16

6.  Management of colorectal cancer patients after resection of liver metastases: can we offer a tailored treatment?

Authors:  Miriam López-Gómez; Paloma Cejas; María Merino; David Fernández-Luengas; Enrique Casado; Jaime Feliu
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 7.  Lymphatic drainage of the liver and its implications in the management of colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Authors:  Renato Micelli Lupinacci; François Paye; Fabricio Ferreira Coelho; Jaime Arthur Pirolla Kruger; Paulo Herman
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2014-08-29

8.  Intrahepatic lymphatic invasion but not vascular invasion is a major prognostic factor after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Authors:  Renato Micelli Lupinacci; Evandro Sobrosa Mello; Rafael S Pinheiro; Gilton Marques; Fabrício Ferreira Coelho; Jaime Arthur Pirolla Kruger; Marcos Vinícius Perini; Paulo Herman
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Histopathological prognostic factors for colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Cássio Virgílio Cavalcante de Oliveira; Gilton Marques Fonseca; Jaime Arthur Pirola Kruger; Evandro Sobroza de Mello; Fabricio Ferreira Coelho; Paulo Herman
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Survival after liver resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors.

Authors:  Gena P Kanas; Aliki Taylor; John N Primrose; Wendy J Langeberg; Michael A Kelsh; Fionna S Mowat; Dominik D Alexander; Michael A Choti; Graeme Poston
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 4.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.