Literature DB >> 1782788

Hand preferences in the skilled gathering tasks of mountain gorillas (Gorilla g. berengei).

R W Byrne1, J M Byrne.   

Abstract

Manual dexterity of 44 wild gorillas of all ages and both sexes was investigated on six naturally acquired feeding tasks of varied logical structure, which included multi-stage and bimanually coordinated procedures. At least 400 min observation of feeding per animal, and analysis at the level of bouts rather than individual actions, can be expected to produce statistically robust results; 22 years background data allowed effects of genealogy and injury to be investigated. Five tasks elicited very strong hand preferences in most animals (weakest on the simplest task), while one was usually performed with a strategy in which left and right hands were used symmetrically; the preferences were fully established at 3 years old. Preferences were highly correlated within each of two sets of tasks, but between the two sets there was no correlation across animals in direction or strength of preference. No population trends towards left or right handers were found in either set of tasks, or both sets pooled; distributions were U-shaped and approximately symmetric, with a slight bias towards right-handed fine manipulation in one set of tasks. Processing efficiency was only slightly greater with the preferred hand, and similar in left- and right-handed animals. Neither direction nor strength of hand preference showed a tendency to run in families, but females showed greater strength of preference. Major injury masked strong hand preference, but injuries could not account for the overall distribution of preference; instead this may reflect inbreeding. Feedback acting on initially random hand choices, and imitation at the "program" level rather than slavish copying of acts, are proposed to account for the results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1782788     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80003-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  36 in total

1.  Action generation and action perception in imitation: an instance of the ideomotor principle.

Authors:  Andreas Wohlschläger; Merideth Gattis; Harold Bekkering
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Imitation as behaviour parsing.

Authors:  R W Byrne
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Hand preferences for unimanual and coordinated bimanual tasks in baboons (Papio anubis).

Authors:  Jacques Vauclair; Adrien Meguerditchian; William D Hopkins
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-09

4.  Wild chimpanzees show population-level handedness for tool use.

Authors:  Elizabeth V Lonsdorf; William D Hopkins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Chimpanzee right-handedness: internal and external validity in the assessment of hand use.

Authors:  William D Hopkins
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 6.  The mirror brain, concepts, and language: the price of anthropogenesis.

Authors:  T V Chernigovskaya
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-03

7.  Handedness in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) is associated with asymmetries of the primary motor cortex but not with homologous language areas.

Authors:  William D Hopkins; Claudio Cantalupo
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Chimpanzee handedness revisited: 55 years since Finch (1941).

Authors:  W D Hopkins
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-12

9.  Bipedal tool use strengthens chimpanzee hand preferences.

Authors:  Stephanie Braccini; Susan Lambeth; Steve Schapiro; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.895

Review 10.  Culture in great apes: using intricate complexity in feeding skills to trace the evolutionary origin of human technical prowess.

Authors:  Richard W Byrne
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.