Literature DB >> 17826838

Differences in public emotions, interest, sense of knowledge and compliance between the affected area and the nationwide general population during the first phase of a bird flu outbreak in Israel.

Rami Peltz1, Galit Avisar-Shohat, Yaron Bar-Dayan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In March 2006, 298,000 cases of birds infected with bird flu were destroyed in nine rural settlements in Israel, out of around 1.2 million birds that were destroyed within these settlements and in a radius of 3 km. The nationwide population was instructed to take preventive measures against the spread of infection. This study aims to compare the emotions, interest, sense of knowledge and compliance, of the population in the affected area with the nationwide general population, during the first phase of a bird flu outbreak in Israel.
METHODS: We conducted a telephone survey among two randomly selected, representative samples of adults. One sample involved 500 adult residents of the nationwide area; and the other sample involved 103 adult residents of the affected area during the first phase of the outbreak. We measured perceived emotions, interest, sense of knowledge and compliance. We analyzed the differences in these parameters between the affected area and the nationwide population using chi-square and t-test analysis. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
RESULTS: The compliance for using measures of precaution was high and not significantly different between the affected area and the nationwide population. The interest in bird flue and the sense of knowledge were significantly higher in the affected area compared to the nationwide population (p<0.05). A misconception of a high human to human transmission was significantly higher in the nationwide population compared with the affected area (p<0.05). The levels of stress and fear perception were significantly lower in the affected area compared to the nationwide population (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Interest, sense of knowledge and emotions of the population are different in the affected area during the early phase of bird flu outbreak compared with the general population in the same country. Authorities must consider these differences while planning the strategy of population education during the early phase of a bird flu outbreak.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17826838     DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2007.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect        ISSN: 0163-4453            Impact factor:   6.072


  7 in total

1.  Design and Feasibility Study of the Mobile Application StopTheSpread.

Authors:  Matthieu Nadini; Samuel Richmond; Jiayi Huang; Alessandro Rizzo; Maurizio Porfiri
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 3.367

2.  Avoidance behaviors and negative psychological responses in the general population in the initial stage of the H1N1 pandemic in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Joseph T F Lau; Sian Griffiths; Kai Chow Choi; Hi Yi Tsui
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.090

3.  Who is willing to risk his life for a patient with a potentially fatal, communicable disease during the peak of A/H1N1 pandemic in Israel?

Authors:  Yaron Bar-Dayan; Noga Boldor; Inbar Kremer; Michal London; Rachel Levy; Maya Iohan Barak; Yosefa Bar-Dayan
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2011-04

Review 4.  Risk perceptions related to SARS and avian influenza: theoretical foundations of current empirical research.

Authors:  Anja Leppin; Arja R Aro
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2009-02-12

5.  Knowledge and attitudes in regard to pandemic influenza A(H1N1) in a multiethnic community of Malaysia.

Authors:  Li Ping Wong; I-Ching Sam
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2011-06

6.  Adequacy of public health communications on H7N9 and MERS in Singapore: insights from a community based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yan'an Hou; Yi-Roe Tan; Wei Yen Lim; Vernon Lee; Linda Wei Lin Tan; Mark I-Cheng Chen; Peiling Yap
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Psychosocial consequences of infectious diseases.

Authors:  G Pappas; I J Kiriaze; P Giannakis; M E Falagas
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 8.067

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.