Literature DB >> 17826646

A 6-month follow-up of intermittent levosimendan administration effect on systolic function, specific activity questionnaire, and arrhythmia in advanced heart failure.

Sophie Mavrogeni1, Gregory Giamouzis, Evangelia Papadopoulou, Sophia Thomopoulou, Athanasios Dritsas, George Athanasopoulos, Elias Adreanides, Ioannis Vassiliadis, Konstantinos Spargias, Dimosthenis Panagiotakos, Dennis V Cokkinos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Levosimendan (LS) improves cardiac contractility without increasing myocardial oxygen demand. We administrated LS on a monthly intermittent 24-hour protocol and evaluated the clinical effect after 6 months in a randomized, open, prospective study. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Fifty patients (age 45-65 years) with LV systolic dysfunction and New York Heart Association (NYHA) III or IV were randomized in 2 groups. LS group (n = 25) was compared with a control group (n = 25) matched for sex, age, and NYHA class. LS was given monthly on a 24-hour intravenous protocol for 6 months. Patients were evaluated by specific activity questionnaire (SAQ) and echocardiography (ECHO) before and 3 to 5 days after last drug administration, whereas 24-hour Holter recording was performed before and during last drug administration. Patients in LS and control group had same baseline SAQ, ECHO, and Holter parameters. At the end of the study, a larger proportion of patients in the levosimendan group reported improvement in symptoms (dyspnea and fatigue) (65% versus 20% in controls, P < .01). After 6 months, the LS group had a significant increase in LV ejection fraction versus controls (28 +/- 7 versus 21 +/- 4 %, P = .003), LV shortening fraction (15 +/- 3 versus 11 +/- 3 %, P = .006) and a decrease in mitral regurgitation (1.5 +/- 0.8 versus 2.7 +/- 0.6, P = .0001). There was no increase in supraventricular or ventricular beats or supraventricular tachycardia and VT episodes in LS group, compared with controls. Two patients from the LS group died in the 6-month follow-up period, compared with 8 patients in the control group (8% versus 32%, P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: A 6-month intermittent LS treatment in patients with decompensated advanced heart failure improved symptoms and LV systolic function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17826646     DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2007.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Fail        ISSN: 1071-9164            Impact factor:   5.712


  24 in total

1.  A single German center experience with intermittent inotropes for patients on the high-urgent heart transplant waiting list.

Authors:  T Hübner; T Nickel; G Steinbeck; S Massberg; R Schramm; B Reichart; C Hagl; A Kiwi; Michael Weis
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  Effects of levosimendan for low cardiac output syndrome in critically ill patients: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Geert Koster; Jørn Wetterslev; Christian Gluud; Jan G Zijlstra; Thomas W L Scheeren; Iwan C C van der Horst; Frederik Keus
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Long-term intravenous inotropes in low-output terminal heart failure?

Authors:  Wolfgang von Scheidt; Matthias Pauschinger; Georg Ertl
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Effects of Levosimendan on Systemic Perfusion in Patients with Low Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) Score: Experience from a Single Center in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ying-Hsiang Wang; Jia-Lin Chen; Chien-Sung Tsai; Yi-Ting Tsai; Chih-Yuan Lin; Hong-Yan Ke; Po-Shun Hsu
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 5.  Inotropic agents and vasodilator strategies for the treatment of cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome.

Authors:  Julia Schumann; Eva C Henrich; Hellen Strobl; Roland Prondzinsky; Sophie Weiche; Holger Thiele; Karl Werdan; Stefan Frantz; Susanne Unverzagt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-01-29

Review 6.  Intermittent levosimendan improves mid-term survival in chronic heart failure patients: meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Simona Silvetti; Teresa Greco; Ambra Licia Di Prima; Marta Mucchetti; Castro Maria de Lurdes; Laura Pasin; Mara Scandroglio; Giovanni Landoni; Alberto Zangrillo
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Intermittent levosimendan treatment in patients with severe congestive heart failure.

Authors:  Petri O Tuomainen; Jarkko Magga; Pekka Timonen; Kati Miettinen; Minna Kurttila; Esko Vanninen; Tomi Laitinen; Kirsi Timonen; Kari Punnonen; Ilkka Parviainen; Ari Uusaro; Olli Vuolteenaho; Matti Kivikko; Keijo Peuhkurinen
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 5.460

8.  Ambulatory Inotrope Infusions in Advanced Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tiana Nizamic; M Hassan Murad; Larry A Allen; Colleen K McIlvennan; Sara E Wordingham; Daniel D Matlock; Shannon M Dunlay
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 12.035

9.  Effect of levosimendan in patients with acute decompensated heart failure : A meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Zhou; L Zhang; J Li
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 1.443

10.  Effects of levosimendan/furosemide infusion on plasma brain natriuretic peptide, echocardiographic parameters and cardiac output in end-stage heart failure patients.

Authors:  Mauro Feola; Enrico Lombardo; Camillo Taglieri; Paola Vallauri; Salvatore Piccolo; Roberto Valle
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-02-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.