Literature DB >> 17826601

Influence of sex and ethnic tooth-size differences on mixed-dentition space analysis.

Edward R Altherr1, Lorne D Koroluk, Ceib Phillips.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Most mixed-dentition space analyses were developed by using subjects of northwestern European descent and unspecified sex. The purpose of this study was to determine the predictive accuracy of the Tanaka-Johnston analysis in white and black subjects in North Carolina.
METHODS: A total of 120 subjects (30 males and 30 females in each ethnic group) were recruited from clinics at the University of North Carolina School of Dentistry. Ethnicity was verified to 2 previous generations. All subjects were less than 21 years of age and had a full complement of permanent teeth. Digital calipers were used to measure the mesiodistal widths of all teeth on study models fabricated from alginate impressions. The predicted widths of the canines and the premolars in both arches were compared with the actual measured widths.
RESULTS: In the maxillary arch, there was a significant interaction of ethnicity and sex on the predictive accuracy of the Tanaka-Johnston analysis (P = .03, factorial ANOVA). The predictive accuracy was significantly overestimated in the white female group (P <.001, least square means). In the mandibular arch, there was no significant interaction between ethnicity and sex (P = .49).
CONCLUSIONS: The Tanaka-Johnston analysis significantly overestimated in females (P <.0001) and underestimated in blacks (P <.0001) (factorial ANOVA). Regression equations were developed to increase the predictive accuracy in both arches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17826601      PMCID: PMC3564554          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  35 in total

1.  Accuracy of Moyers' probability chart in a group of Thai subjects.

Authors:  S Dechkunakorn; J Chaiwat; P Sawaengkit
Journal:  J Dent Assoc Thai       Date:  1990 May-Jun

2.  Comparisons of mesiodistal and buccolingual crown dimensions of the permanent teeth in three populations from Egypt, Mexico, and the United States.

Authors:  S E Bishara; J R Jakobsen; E M Abdallah; A Fernandez Garcia
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Mixed dentition analysis for black Americans.

Authors:  H H Frankel; E M Benz
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.874

4.  Mesiodistal crown dimensions in Mexico and the United States.

Authors:  S E Bishara; A Fernandez Garcia; J R Jakobsen; J A Fahl
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Permanent mesiodistal tooth size of French-Canadians.

Authors:  P H Buschang; A Demirjian; L Cadotte
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  Mesiodistal crown dimensions of permanent teeth of black Americans.

Authors:  D J Macko; F S Ferguson; E M Sonnenberg
Journal:  ASDC J Dent Child       Date:  1979 Jul-Aug

7.  A biometric study of tooth size and dental crowding.

Authors:  J M Doris; B W Bernard; M M Kuftinec; D Stom
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1981-03

8.  Tooth crown size differences between age groups: a possible new indicator of stress in skeletal samples.

Authors:  M F Guagliardo
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 2.868

Review 9.  Relation of sex and occlusion to mesiodistal tooth size.

Authors:  B S Arya; B S Savara; D Thomas; Q Clarkson
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1974-11

10.  An examination of dental crowding and its relationship to tooth size and arch dimension.

Authors:  R P Howe; J A McNamara; K A O'Connor
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1983-05
View more
  9 in total

1.  Effect of intermaxillary tooth-size discrepancy on accuracy of prediction equations for mixed dentition space analysis.

Authors:  R Khanna; R K Pandey; S Tripathi
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2014-11-06

2.  Demonstration of a sex difference in the predictability of widths of unerupted permanent canines and premolars in a Japanese population.

Authors:  Wakako Tome; Yoshiaki Ohyama; Masakazu Yagi; Kenji Takada
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Applicability of Tanaka Jhonston Method and Prediction of Mesiodistal Width of Canines and Premolars in Children.

Authors:  Umapathy Thimmegowda; Kumar B Niwlikar; Vaibhav Khare; Ashwini Chikkanayakanahalli Prabhakar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-06-01

4.  Evaluation of mixed dentition analyses in north Indian population: A comparative study.

Authors:  Ravi Kumar Goyal; Vijay P Sharma; Pradeep Tandon; Amit Nagar; Gyan P Singh
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2014-10

5.  Tooth eruption sequence and dental crowding: a case-control study.

Authors:  Vahid Moshkelgosha; Negar Khosravifard; Ali Golkari
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2014-06-06

6.  Validity of moyers mixed dentition analysis for Saudi population.

Authors:  Yousef H Al-Dlaigan; Nasser D Alqahtani; Khalid Almoammar; Thikriat Al-Jewair; Fahad Bin Salamah; Mohamme Alswilem; Sahar F Albarakati
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

7.  Equation for Tooth Size Prediction from Mixed Dentition Analysis for Taiwanese Population: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  See Yen Chong; Lwin Moe Aung; Yu-Hwa Pan; Wei-Jen Chang; Chi-Yang Tsai
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Accuracy of four tooth size prediction methods on malay population.

Authors:  Belal Khaled Mahmoud; Saifeddin Hamed I Abu Asab; Haslina Taib
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2012-11-14

9.  Prediction of canine and premolar size using the widths of various permanent teeth combinations: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Kalasandhya Vanjari; Sivakumar Nuvvula; Rekhalakshmi Kamatham
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2015-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.