Literature DB >> 17826558

Objective features and aesthetic outcome of pollicized digits compared with normal thumbs.

Charles A Goldfarb1, Valerie Deardorff, Ben Chia, Amy Meander, Paul R Manske.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the objective features and subjective aesthetic outcome of pollicized digits compared with normal thumbs.
METHODS: Thirty-one pollicized digits in 26 patients were evaluated at an average 41 months after surgery. The length, girth, and nail width were measured and compared with previously reported data for normal thumbs. A surgeon, therapist, and caregiver completed Visual Analog Scales (VAS) to subjectively assess the aesthetic outcome; they also provided the principal reasons for their assessment of the altered appearance compared with normal thumbs. All data were statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: The average length of the pollicized digit relative to the long finger proximal phalanx was 90% (+/-26%), compared with an age-matched normal average of 71%. The girth of the pollicized digit relative to the long finger was 92% (+/-8%), compared with an age-matched normal thumb average of 132%. The nail width of the pollicized digit relative to the nail width of the long finger was 96% (+/-9%), compared with an age-matched normal thumb average of 104%. The VAS scores averaged 7.3 for the caregiver, 6 for the therapist, and 6.4 for the surgeon. The most frequently cited (altered) features were narrow girth, angulation, and excess length of the pollicized digit.
CONCLUSIONS: Pollicized digits are longer and have reduced girth and nail width compared with age-matched normal thumbs. The most significantly abnormal features are decreased girth, excess length, and angulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17826558     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.05.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  6 in total

1.  Embryology, diagnosis, and evaluation of congenital hand anomalies.

Authors:  Christopher J Dy; Ishaan Swarup; Aaron Daluiski
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-03

Review 2.  Do Patient- and Parent-reported Outcomes Measures for Children With Congenital Hand Differences Capture WHO-ICF Domains?

Authors:  Joshua M Adkinson; Rebecca S Bickham; Kevin C Chung; Jennifer F Waljee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Outcome of index finger pollicisation.

Authors:  Laurence Ceulemans; Ilse Degreef; Philippe Debeer; Luc De Smet
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2010-08-11

4.  Pollicization of the index finger in hypoplasia of the thumb. Experience with the method of Buck-Gramcko and retrospective analysis of the clinical outcome in a series of 19 pollicizations.

Authors:  Piza-Katzer Hildegunde; Wenger Andrea; Baur Eva-Maria; Estermann Dunja; Rieger Michael
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2009-07-10

5.  A re-look at pollicization.

Authors:  Bhaskaranand Kumar; Ashwath Acharya; Anil K Bhat
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2011-05

6.  Methods for Congenital Thumb Hypoplasia Reconstruction. A Review of the Outcomes for Ten Years of Surgical Treatment.

Authors:  Dzintars Ozols; Marisa Maija Butnere; Aigars Petersons
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.