Literature DB >> 17826432

Predictors of failed operative vaginal delivery: a single-center experience.

Avi Ben-Haroush1, Nir Melamed, Boris Kaplan, Yariv Yogev.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify factors that predict operative vaginal delivery. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted that included all women who underwent a trial of operative vaginal delivery between 1993 and 2006 at a major tertiary center.
RESULTS: Operative vaginal delivery was attempted in 5120 of 83,351 deliveries (6.1%): 4299 vacuum extractions (84.0%) and 821 forceps deliveries (16.0%). Failures occurred in 8.6% of trials, more often with vacuum extraction (10.0% vs 1.3%; P < .001). Most vacuum extraction failures (72.6%) were followed by a trial of forceps delivery, which failed in 3.5% of cases. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, the use of forceps (vs vacuum; odds ratio [OR], 0.4; 95%CI, 0.2-0.7) and administration of analgesia (epidural: OR, 0.4 [95% CI, 0.2-0.7]; intravenous opiates: OR, 0.2 [95%CI, 0.1-0.6]) were associated with a lower risk of failure, persistent occiput posterior position (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4-3.5) and birthweight >4000 g (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.6-4.9), with a higher risk.
CONCLUSION: Fetal weight and head position should be evaluated carefully before operative vaginal delivery, and the use of analgesia should be encouraged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17826432     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.06.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

1.  Factors influencing the likelihood of instrumental delivery success.

Authors:  Catherine E Aiken; Abigail R Aiken; Jeremy C Brockelsby; James G Scott
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Study protocol. IDUS - Instrumental delivery & ultrasound: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery.

Authors:  Deirdre J Murphy; Gerard Burke; Alan A Montgomery; Meenakshi Ramphul
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Determinants and Outcomes of Emergency Caesarean Section following Failed Instrumental Delivery: 5-Year Observational Review at a Tertiary Referral Centre in London.

Authors:  Sian McDonnell; Edwin Chandraharan
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2015-05-11

4.  Naegele Forceps Delivery and Association between Morbidity and the Number of Forceps Traction Applications: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Naoki Matsumoto; Toshifumi Takenaka; Nobuyuki Ikeda; Satoshi Yazaki; Yuichi Sato
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2015-09-03

5.  A prospective cohort study of the morbidity associated with operative vaginal deliveries performed by day and at night.

Authors:  Katherine Butler; Meenakshi Ramphul; Clare Dunney; Maria Farren; Aoife McSweeney; Karen McNamara; Deirdre J Murphy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Prospective assessment of vacuum deliveries from midpelvic station in a tertiary care university hospital: Frequency, failure rates, labor characteristics and maternal and neonatal complications.

Authors:  Meryam Sugulle; Erna Halldórsdóttir; Janne Kvile; Line Sissel Dahlgaard Berntzen; Anne Flem Jacobsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.