OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess whether knowledge of ST-segment analysis was associated with a reduction in operative deliveries for nonreassuring fetal status (NRFS) or with a need for at least 1 scalp pH during labor. STUDY DESIGN:Seven hundred ninety-nine women at term with abnormal cardiotocography or meconium-stained amniotic fluid (7%) were assigned randomly to the intervention group (cardiotocography + STAN) or the control group (cardiotocography) in 2 university hospitals in Strasbourg, France. Scalp pH testing was optional in both groups. Abnormal neonatal outcome was pH <7.05 or umbilical cord blood artery base deficit of >12 or a 5-min Apgar score of <7 or neonatal intensive care unit admission or convulsions or neonatal death. Study power was 80% for the detection of a prespecified reduction from 50%-40% in operative delivery for NRFS. RESULTS: The operative delivery (cesarean or instrumental) rate for NRFS did not differ between the 2 groups: 33.6% (134/399) in the cardiotocography + STAN analysis group vs 37% (148/400) in the cardiotocography group (relative risk, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.75-1.10). The rate of operative delivery for dystocia was also similar in both groups. The percentage of women whose fetus had at least 1 scalp pH measurement during labor was substantially lower in the group with ST-segment analysis: 27% compared with 62% (relative risk, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.36-0.52). Neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSION: In a population with abnormal cardiotocography in labor, cardiotocography combined with ST-segment analysis was not associated with a reduction in operative deliveries for NRFS. The proportion of infants without scalp pH sampling during labor increased substantially, however.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess whether knowledge of ST-segment analysis was associated with a reduction in operative deliveries for nonreassuring fetal status (NRFS) or with a need for at least 1 scalp pH during labor. STUDY DESIGN: Seven hundred ninety-nine women at term with abnormal cardiotocography or meconium-stained amniotic fluid (7%) were assigned randomly to the intervention group (cardiotocography + STAN) or the control group (cardiotocography) in 2 university hospitals in Strasbourg, France. Scalp pH testing was optional in both groups. Abnormal neonatal outcome was pH <7.05 or umbilical cord blood artery base deficit of >12 or a 5-min Apgar score of <7 or neonatal intensive care unit admission or convulsions or neonatal death. Study power was 80% for the detection of a prespecified reduction from 50%-40% in operative delivery for NRFS. RESULTS: The operative delivery (cesarean or instrumental) rate for NRFS did not differ between the 2 groups: 33.6% (134/399) in the cardiotocography + STAN analysis group vs 37% (148/400) in the cardiotocography group (relative risk, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.75-1.10). The rate of operative delivery for dystocia was also similar in both groups. The percentage of women whose fetus had at least 1 scalp pH measurement during labor was substantially lower in the group with ST-segment analysis: 27% compared with 62% (relative risk, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.36-0.52). Neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSION: In a population with abnormal cardiotocography in labor, cardiotocography combined with ST-segment analysis was not associated with a reduction in operative deliveries for NRFS. The proportion of infants without scalp pH sampling during labor increased substantially, however.
Authors: Beth A Plunkett; Steven J Weiner; George R Saade; Michael A Belfort; Sean C Blackwell; John M Thorp; Alan T N Tita; Russell S Miller; David S McKenna; Edward K S Chien; Dwight J Rouse; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Yoram Sorokin; Steve N Caritis Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2022-04-05 Impact factor: 3.079
Authors: Michael A Belfort; George R Saade; Elizabeth Thom; Sean C Blackwell; Uma M Reddy; John M Thorp; Alan T N Tita; Russell S Miller; Alan M Peaceman; David S McKenna; Edward K S Chien; Dwight J Rouse; Ronald S Gibbs; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Yoram Sorokin; Steve N Caritis; J Peter VanDorsten Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Rik Vullings; Kim M J Verdurmen; Alexandra D J Hulsenboom; Stephanie Scheffer; Hinke de Lau; Anneke Kwee; Pieter F F Wijn; Isis Amer-Wåhlin; Judith O E H van Laar; S Guid Oei Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-04-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Gerard Cummins; Jessica Kremer; Anne Bernassau; Andrew Brown; Helen L Bridle; Holger Schulze; Till T Bachmann; Michael Crichton; Fiona C Denison; Marc P Y Desmulliez Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2018-08-13 Impact factor: 3.576