Literature DB >> 17826428

A French randomized controlled trial of ST-segment analysis in a population with abnormal cardiotocograms during labor.

Christophe Vayssière1, Eric David, Nicolas Meyer, Renaud Haberstich, Valérie Sebahoun, Emmanuel Roth, Romain Favre, Israël Nisand, Bruno Langer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess whether knowledge of ST-segment analysis was associated with a reduction in operative deliveries for nonreassuring fetal status (NRFS) or with a need for at least 1 scalp pH during labor. STUDY
DESIGN: Seven hundred ninety-nine women at term with abnormal cardiotocography or meconium-stained amniotic fluid (7%) were assigned randomly to the intervention group (cardiotocography + STAN) or the control group (cardiotocography) in 2 university hospitals in Strasbourg, France. Scalp pH testing was optional in both groups. Abnormal neonatal outcome was pH <7.05 or umbilical cord blood artery base deficit of >12 or a 5-min Apgar score of <7 or neonatal intensive care unit admission or convulsions or neonatal death. Study power was 80% for the detection of a prespecified reduction from 50%-40% in operative delivery for NRFS.
RESULTS: The operative delivery (cesarean or instrumental) rate for NRFS did not differ between the 2 groups: 33.6% (134/399) in the cardiotocography + STAN analysis group vs 37% (148/400) in the cardiotocography group (relative risk, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.75-1.10). The rate of operative delivery for dystocia was also similar in both groups. The percentage of women whose fetus had at least 1 scalp pH measurement during labor was substantially lower in the group with ST-segment analysis: 27% compared with 62% (relative risk, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.36-0.52). Neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly between groups.
CONCLUSION: In a population with abnormal cardiotocography in labor, cardiotocography combined with ST-segment analysis was not associated with a reduction in operative deliveries for NRFS. The proportion of infants without scalp pH sampling during labor increased substantially, however.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17826428     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  12 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and treatment of fetal arrhythmia.

Authors:  Annette Wacker-Gussmann; Janette F Strasburger; Bettina F Cuneo; Ronald T Wakai
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Maternal Diabetes and Intrapartum Fetal Electrocardiogram.

Authors:  Beth A Plunkett; Steven J Weiner; George R Saade; Michael A Belfort; Sean C Blackwell; John M Thorp; Alan T N Tita; Russell S Miller; David S McKenna; Edward K S Chien; Dwight J Rouse; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Yoram Sorokin; Steve N Caritis
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.079

Review 3.  What we have learned about intrapartum fetal monitoring trials in the MFMU Network.

Authors:  Steven L Bloom; Michael Belfort; George Saade
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.300

4.  A Randomized Trial of Intrapartum Fetal ECG ST-Segment Analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Belfort; George R Saade; Elizabeth Thom; Sean C Blackwell; Uma M Reddy; John M Thorp; Alan T N Tita; Russell S Miller; Alan M Peaceman; David S McKenna; Edward K S Chien; Dwight J Rouse; Ronald S Gibbs; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Yoram Sorokin; Steve N Caritis; J Peter VanDorsten
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour.

Authors:  James P Neilson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-21

Review 6.  A critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. Part I: the randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Per Olofsson; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; Jörg Kessler; Britta Tendal; Branka M Yli; Lawrence Devoe
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 7.  A critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. Part II: the meta-analyses.

Authors:  Per Olofsson; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; Jörg Kessler; Britta Tendal; Branka M Yli; Lawrence Devoe
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  The electrical heart axis and ST events in fetal monitoring: A post-hoc analysis following a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Rik Vullings; Kim M J Verdurmen; Alexandra D J Hulsenboom; Stephanie Scheffer; Hinke de Lau; Anneke Kwee; Pieter F F Wijn; Isis Amer-Wåhlin; Judith O E H van Laar; S Guid Oei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Fetal ECG extraction from abdominal signals: a review on suppression of fundamental power line interference component and its harmonics.

Authors:  Dragoş-Daniel Ţarălungă; Georgeta-Mihaela Ungureanu; Ilinca Gussi; Rodica Strungaru; Werner Wolf
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 10.  Sensors for Fetal Hypoxia and Metabolic Acidosis: A Review.

Authors:  Gerard Cummins; Jessica Kremer; Anne Bernassau; Andrew Brown; Helen L Bridle; Holger Schulze; Till T Bachmann; Michael Crichton; Fiona C Denison; Marc P Y Desmulliez
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.