Literature DB >> 17826080

Understanding variation in the management of rectal cancer: the potential of a surgeon-initiated database.

Neil Hyman1, Christopher Healey, Turner Osler, Peter Cataldo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Administrative databases oversimplify the relationship of factors such as volume or training on surgical outcomes.
METHODS: A prospective statewide surgeon-initiated database was queried to obtain incident cases of rectal cancer in Vermont from April 1999 to June 2001. Demographics, procedure performed, method of detection, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, blood transfusions, length of stay, complications, stage, and use of adjuvant therapy were recorded by the operating surgeon. A post hoc analysis was performed on patients operated on for rectal cancer to define the specific impact of specialty training on care patterns.
RESULTS: There was a marked difference in the distribution of surgical procedures, with colorectal surgeons using local excision and coloanal anastomosis in addition to anterior and abdominoperineal resection. Although the overall use of adjuvant therapy was similar, patients in the colorectal group were more likely to receive preoperative then postoperative radiation therapy (91% vs 17%, P <.0001) and more likely to receive radiation therapy when stage appropriate (98% vs 67%, P <.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal specialty training in this population was a surrogate for a wider array of surgical options and preoperative radiation. Failure to use radiation when stage-appropriate was related to patient comorbidities and/or refusal and not related to failure of the surgeon to offer adjuvant therapy. Prospective, surgeon-initiated databases provide an excellent opportunity to identify and understand practice variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17826080     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.01.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  5 in total

1.  Management of primary rectal cancer by surgeons in Atlantic Canada: results of a regional survey.

Authors:  Teong Kuan Chuah; Tracy Lee; Debrah Wirtzfeld; William Pollett
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Factors associated with use of preoperative chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium.

Authors:  Mary E Charlton; Chi Lin; Dingfeng Jiang; Karyn B Stitzenberg; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Jane F Pendergast; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Robert B Wallace
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.339

3.  Hospital Characteristics Associated with Stage II/III Rectal Cancer Guideline Concordant Care: Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare Data.

Authors:  Mary E Charlton; Jennifer E Hrabe; Kara B Wright; Jennifer A Schlichting; Bradley D McDowell; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Chi Lin; Karyn B Stitzenberg; John W Cromwell
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Death after bowel resection: patient disease, not surgeon error.

Authors:  Neil H Hyman; Peter A Cataldo; Elizabeth H Burns; Steven R Shackford
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Determinants of Rectal Cancer Patients' Decisions on Where to Receive Surgery: a Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Mary E Charlton; Ariana F Shahnazi; Irena Gribovskaja-Rupp; Lisa Hunter; Michele A Mengeling; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Charles F Lynch; Marcia M Ward
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 3.452

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.