Literature DB >> 17825719

The value of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in screening asymptomatic patients with atrial fibrillation for coronary artery disease.

J Wells Askew1, Todd D Miller, David O Hodge, Raymond J Gibbons.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine if screening for coronary artery disease (CAD) with stress single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is of value in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who do not have symptoms of chest pain or dyspnea.
BACKGROUND: Although noninvasive stress testing is often done to screen for CAD in asymptomatic patients with AF and is considered to be appropriate in selected patients, its potential utility has not been demonstrated.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of 374 asymptomatic patients with AF referred for the detection of CAD. Mean follow-up was 5.7 +/- 3.8 years. The study group was compared with a control group of 374 asymptomatic age and gender-matched patients without AF.
RESULTS: The mean summed stress score (SSS) was not significantly different between AF patients and control subjects (3.6 +/- 5.3 vs. 3.5 +/- 5.9; p = 0.35). Compared with controls, asymptomatic AF patients had similar rates of abnormal SPECT studies (51.6% vs. 48.4%; p = 0.38) and high-risk studies (14.4% vs. 14.4%; p = 1.0). The SSS was a significant predictor of outcome in both AF patients and control subjects. However, total mortality was significantly greater in AF patients (5-year overall mortality 27% vs. 18%, 10-year overall mortality 47% vs. 40%; p < 0.001), and this difference persisted (p = 0.01) after adjusting for multiple clinical variables and the SSS.
CONCLUSIONS: Screening for CAD using stress SPECT in asymptomatic AF patients has a yield similar to age- and gender-matched control patients without AF. Although SSS predicts mortality in patients with and without AF, patients with AF have increased total mortality independent of the findings on stress SPECT. These results suggest that factors other than obstructive CAD are responsible for the increased mortality in AF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17825719     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.05.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  5 in total

1.  Downstream clinical implications of abnormal myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography based on appropriate use criteria.

Authors:  Farhan J Khawaja; Hayan Jouni; Todd D Miller; David O Hodge; Raymond J Gibbons
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Atrial Fibrillation in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Jason C Rubenstein; Michael P Cinquegrani; Jennifer Wright
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2012-06-15

3.  Finding value in imaging: what is appropriate?

Authors:  Raymond J Gibbons
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.872

4.  Relationship between obstructive coronary artery disease and abnormal stress testing in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Gaetano Nucifora; Joanne D Schuijf; Jacob M van Werkhoven; Serge A Trines; Sami Kajander; Laurens F Tops; Olli Turta; J Wouter Jukema; Joop H M Schreur; Mark W Heijenbrok; Oliver Gaemperli; Philipp A Kaufmann; Juhani Knuuti; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Negative predictive value of SPECT for the occurrence of MACE in a medium-sized clinic in the Netherlands.

Authors:  M J Bom; J M B Manders; R Uijlings; E A Badings; F M A C Martens
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.380

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.