J Wells Askew1, Todd D Miller, David O Hodge, Raymond J Gibbons. 1. Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. askew.john@mayo.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine if screening for coronary artery disease (CAD) with stress single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is of value in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who do not have symptoms of chest pain or dyspnea. BACKGROUND: Although noninvasive stress testing is often done to screen for CAD in asymptomatic patients with AF and is considered to be appropriate in selected patients, its potential utility has not been demonstrated. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of 374 asymptomatic patients with AF referred for the detection of CAD. Mean follow-up was 5.7 +/- 3.8 years. The study group was compared with a control group of 374 asymptomatic age and gender-matched patients without AF. RESULTS: The mean summed stress score (SSS) was not significantly different between AF patients and control subjects (3.6 +/- 5.3 vs. 3.5 +/- 5.9; p = 0.35). Compared with controls, asymptomatic AF patients had similar rates of abnormal SPECT studies (51.6% vs. 48.4%; p = 0.38) and high-risk studies (14.4% vs. 14.4%; p = 1.0). The SSS was a significant predictor of outcome in both AF patients and control subjects. However, total mortality was significantly greater in AF patients (5-year overall mortality 27% vs. 18%, 10-year overall mortality 47% vs. 40%; p < 0.001), and this difference persisted (p = 0.01) after adjusting for multiple clinical variables and the SSS. CONCLUSIONS: Screening for CAD using stress SPECT in asymptomatic AF patients has a yield similar to age- and gender-matched control patients without AF. Although SSS predicts mortality in patients with and without AF, patients with AF have increased total mortality independent of the findings on stress SPECT. These results suggest that factors other than obstructive CAD are responsible for the increased mortality in AF.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine if screening for coronary artery disease (CAD) with stress single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is of value in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who do not have symptoms of chest pain or dyspnea. BACKGROUND: Although noninvasive stress testing is often done to screen for CAD in asymptomatic patients with AF and is considered to be appropriate in selected patients, its potential utility has not been demonstrated. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of 374 asymptomatic patients with AF referred for the detection of CAD. Mean follow-up was 5.7 +/- 3.8 years. The study group was compared with a control group of 374 asymptomatic age and gender-matched patients without AF. RESULTS: The mean summed stress score (SSS) was not significantly different between AFpatients and control subjects (3.6 +/- 5.3 vs. 3.5 +/- 5.9; p = 0.35). Compared with controls, asymptomatic AFpatients had similar rates of abnormal SPECT studies (51.6% vs. 48.4%; p = 0.38) and high-risk studies (14.4% vs. 14.4%; p = 1.0). The SSS was a significant predictor of outcome in both AFpatients and control subjects. However, total mortality was significantly greater in AFpatients (5-year overall mortality 27% vs. 18%, 10-year overall mortality 47% vs. 40%; p < 0.001), and this difference persisted (p = 0.01) after adjusting for multiple clinical variables and the SSS. CONCLUSIONS: Screening for CAD using stress SPECT in asymptomatic AFpatients has a yield similar to age- and gender-matched control patients without AF. Although SSS predicts mortality in patients with and without AF, patients with AF have increased total mortality independent of the findings on stress SPECT. These results suggest that factors other than obstructive CAD are responsible for the increased mortality in AF.
Authors: Gaetano Nucifora; Joanne D Schuijf; Jacob M van Werkhoven; Serge A Trines; Sami Kajander; Laurens F Tops; Olli Turta; J Wouter Jukema; Joop H M Schreur; Mark W Heijenbrok; Oliver Gaemperli; Philipp A Kaufmann; Juhani Knuuti; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-10-16 Impact factor: 2.357