BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of evidence-based medicine in medical education, little observational research exists on how doctors-in-training seek and use evidence from information resources in ambulatory care. OBJECTIVE: To describe information exchange behaviour by internal medicine residents and attendings in ambulatory resident clinic precepting rooms. DESIGN: We observed resident behaviour and audiotaped resident-attending doctor interactions during precepting sessions. PARTICIPANTS: Participating residents included 70 of an eligible 89 residents and 28 of 34 eligible attendings from one large academic internal medicine residency programme in the Midwestern USA. Residents were observed during 95 separate precepting interactions at four ambulatory sites. APPROACH: Using a qualitative approach, we analysed transcripts and field notes of observed behaviours and interactions looking for themes of information exchange. Coders discussed themes which were refined using feedback from an interdisciplinary panel. RESULTS: Four themes of information exchange behaviour emerged: (i) questioning behaviours that were used as part of the communication process in which the resident and attending doctor could reason together; (ii) searching behaviour of non-human knowledge sources occurred in a minority of precepting interations; (iii) unsolicited knowledge offering and (iv) answering behaviours were important means of exchanging information. CONCLUSIONS: Most clinic interactions between resident and attending doctors relied heavily on spoken deliberation without resorting to the scientific literature or other published information resources. These observations suggest a range of factors that may moderate information exchange behaviour in the precepting context including relationships, space and efficiency. Future research should aim to more readily adapt information resources to the relationships and practice context of precepting.
BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of evidence-based medicine in medical education, little observational research exists on how doctors-in-training seek and use evidence from information resources in ambulatory care. OBJECTIVE: To describe information exchange behaviour by internal medicine residents and attendings in ambulatory resident clinic precepting rooms. DESIGN: We observed resident behaviour and audiotaped resident-attending doctor interactions during precepting sessions. PARTICIPANTS: Participating residents included 70 of an eligible 89 residents and 28 of 34 eligible attendings from one large academic internal medicine residency programme in the Midwestern USA. Residents were observed during 95 separate precepting interactions at four ambulatory sites. APPROACH: Using a qualitative approach, we analysed transcripts and field notes of observed behaviours and interactions looking for themes of information exchange. Coders discussed themes which were refined using feedback from an interdisciplinary panel. RESULTS: Four themes of information exchange behaviour emerged: (i) questioning behaviours that were used as part of the communication process in which the resident and attending doctor could reason together; (ii) searching behaviour of non-human knowledge sources occurred in a minority of precepting interations; (iii) unsolicited knowledge offering and (iv) answering behaviours were important means of exchanging information. CONCLUSIONS: Most clinic interactions between resident and attending doctors relied heavily on spoken deliberation without resorting to the scientific literature or other published information resources. These observations suggest a range of factors that may moderate information exchange behaviour in the precepting context including relationships, space and efficiency. Future research should aim to more readily adapt information resources to the relationships and practice context of precepting.
Authors: Salimah Z Shariff; Meaghan S Cuerden; R Brian Haynes; K Ann McKibbon; Nancy L Wilczynski; Arthur V Iansavichus; Mark R Speechley; Amardeep Thind; Amit X Garg Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2010-07-20 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: T Michael Kashner; John M Byrne; Steven S Henley; Richard M Golden; David C Aron; Grant W Cannon; Barbara K Chang; Stuart C Gilman; Gloria J Holland; Catherine P Kaminetzky; Sheri A Keitz; Elaine A Muchmore; Tetyana K Kashner; Annie B Wicker Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2010-03
Authors: Lisanne S Welink; Tessa C van Charldorp; Laura Di Colandrea; Marie-Louise L Bartelink; Peter Pype; Roger A M J Damoiseaux; Esther de Groot Journal: Med Educ Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 7.647