Literature DB >> 17824436

Costs and benefits of pocket gopher foraging: linking behavior and physiology.

Stephanie S Romañach1, Eric W Seabloom, O J Reichman.   

Abstract

Animals can attain fitness benefits by maintaining a positive net energy balance, including costs of movement during resource acquisition and the profits from foraging. Subterranean rodent burrowing provides an excellent system in which to examine the effects of movement costs on foraging behavior because it is energetically expensive to excavate burrows. We used an individual-based modeling approach to study pocket gopher foraging and its relationship to digging cost, food abundance, and food distribution. We used a unique combination of an individual-based foraging-behavior model and an energetic model to assess survival, body mass dynamics, and burrow configurations. Our model revealed that even the extreme cost of digging is not as costly as it appears when compared to metabolic costs. Concentrating digging in the area where food was found, or area-restricted search (ARS), was the most energetically efficient digging strategy compared to a random strategy. Field data show that natural burrow configurations were more closely approximated by the animals we modeled using ARS compared to random diggers. By using behavior and simple physiological principles in our model, we were able to observe realistic body mass dynamics and recreate natural movement patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17824436     DOI: 10.1890/06-1461.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  3 in total

1.  The power of odour cues in shaping fine-scale search patterns of foraging mammalian herbivores.

Authors:  Cristian Gabriel Orlando; Ashley Tews; Peter Banks; Clare McArthur
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Getting a head in hard soils: Convergent skull evolution and divergent allometric patterns explain shape variation in a highly diverse genus of pocket gophers (Thomomys).

Authors:  Ariel E Marcy; Elizabeth A Hadly; Emma Sherratt; Kathleen Garland; Vera Weisbecker
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.260

3.  Morphological adaptations for digging and climate-impacted soil properties define pocket gopher (Thomomys spp.) distributions.

Authors:  Ariel E Marcy; Scott Fendorf; James L Patton; Elizabeth A Hadly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.