Literature DB >> 17824434

Prey density and the behavioral flexibility of a marine predator: the common murre (Uria aalge).

Ann M A Harding1, John F Piatt, Joel A Schmutz, Michael T Shultz, Thomas I Van Pelt, Arthur B Kettle, Suzann G Speckman.   

Abstract

Flexible time budgets allow individual animals to buffer the effects of variable food availability by allocating more time to foraging when food density decreases. This trait should be especially important for marine predators that forage on patchy and ephemeral food resources. We examined flexible time allocation by a long-lived marine predator, the Common Murre (Uria aalge), using data collected in a five-year study at three colonies in Alaska (USA) with contrasting environmental conditions. Annual hydroacoustic surveys revealed an order-of-magnitude variation in food density among the 15 colony-years of study. We used data on parental time budgets and local prey density to test predictions from two hypotheses: Hypothesis A, the colony attendance of seabirds varies nonlinearly with food density; and Hypothesis B, flexible time allocation of parent murres buffers chicks against variable food availability. Hypothesis A was supported; colony attendance by murres was positively correlated with food over a limited range of poor-to-moderate food densities, but independent of food over a broader range of higher densities. This is the first empirical evidence for a nonlinear response of a marine predator's time budget to changes in prey density. Predictions from Hypothesis B were largely supported: (1) chick-feeding rates were fairly constant over a wide range of densities and only dropped below 3.5 meals per day at the low end of prey density, and (2) there was a nonlinear relationship between chick-feeding rates and time spent at the colony, with chick-feeding rates only declining after time at the colony by the nonbrooding parent was reduced to a minimum. The ability of parents to adjust their foraging time by more than 2 h/d explains why they were able to maintain chick-feeding rates of more than 3.5 meals/d across a 10-fold range in local food density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17824434     DOI: 10.1890/06-1695.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  9 in total

1.  Windscapes shape seabird instantaneous energy costs but adult behavior buffers impact on offspring.

Authors:  Kyle Hamish Elliott; Lorraine S Chivers; Lauren Bessey; Anthony J Gaston; Scott A Hatch; Akiko Kato; Orla Osborne; Yan Ropert-Coudert; John R Speakman; James F Hare
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.600

2.  Modelling foraging movements of diving predators: a theoretical study exploring the effect of heterogeneous landscapes on foraging efficiency.

Authors:  Marianna Chimienti; Kamil A Bartoń; Beth E Scott; Justin M J Travis
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Ecosystem response persists after a prolonged marine heatwave.

Authors:  Robert M Suryan; Mayumi L Arimitsu; Heather A Coletti; Russell R Hopcroft; Mandy R Lindeberg; Steven J Barbeaux; Sonia D Batten; William J Burt; Mary A Bishop; James L Bodkin; Richard Brenner; Robert W Campbell; Daniel A Cushing; Seth L Danielson; Martin W Dorn; Brie Drummond; Daniel Esler; Thomas Gelatt; Dana H Hanselman; Scott A Hatch; Stormy Haught; Kris Holderied; Katrin Iken; David B Irons; Arthur B Kettle; David G Kimmel; Brenda Konar; Kathy J Kuletz; Benjamin J Laurel; John M Maniscalco; Craig Matkin; Caitlin A E McKinstry; Daniel H Monson; John R Moran; Dan Olsen; Wayne A Palsson; W Scott Pegau; John F Piatt; Lauren A Rogers; Nora A Rojek; Anne Schaefer; Ingrid B Spies; Janice M Straley; Suzanne L Strom; Kathryn L Sweeney; Marysia Szymkowiak; Benjamin P Weitzman; Ellen M Yasumiishi; Stephani G Zador
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Foraging dive frequency predicts body mass gain in the Adélie penguin.

Authors:  Amélie Lescroël; Annie Schmidt; Megan Elrod; David G Ainley; Grant Ballard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The influence of seabirds on their breeding, roosting and nesting grounds: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Megan L Grant; Alexander L Bond; Jennifer L Lavers
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Parents are a drag: long-lived birds share the cost of increased foraging effort with their offspring, but males pass on more of the costs than females.

Authors:  Shoshanah R Jacobs; Kyle Hamish Elliott; Anthony J Gaston
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Recreational Fish-Finders--An Inexpensive Alternative to Scientific Echo-Sounders for Unravelling the Links between Marine Top Predators and Their Prey.

Authors:  Alistair M McInnes; Arjun Khoosal; Ben Murrell; Dagmar Merkle; Miguel Lacerda; Reason Nyengera; Janet C Coetzee; Loyd C Edwards; Peter G Ryan; Johan Rademan; Jan J van der Westhuizen; Lorien Pichegru
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Seasonal Variation in Parental Care Drives Sex-Specific Foraging by a Monomorphic Seabird.

Authors:  Chantelle M Burke; William A Montevecchi; Paul M Regular
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Balancing personal maintenance with parental investment in a chick-rearing seabird: physiological indicators change with foraging conditions.

Authors:  Anne E Storey; Morag G Ryan; Michelle G Fitzsimmons; Amy-Lee Kouwenberg; Linda S Takahashi; Gregory J Robertson; Sabina I Wilhelm; Donald W McKay; Gene R Herzberg; Frances K Mowbray; Luke MacMillan; Carolyn J Walsh
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 3.079

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.