Literature DB >> 17823467

Responding to medical pluralism in practice: a principled ethical approach.

Jon C Tilburt1, Franklin G Miller.   

Abstract

The popularity of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) raises a range of ethical issues for practicing clinicians. Principles of biomedical ethics define obligations of health care professionals, but applying principles in particular cases at the interface of CAM and biomedicine may be particularly challenging. "Recognition of medical pluralism" can help clinicians' ethical deliberations related to CAM. Here we outline a 3-point practical approach to applying basic principles of biomedical ethics in light of medical pluralism: (1) inquiring about CAM use and the scientific evidence related to CAM, (2) acknowledging the health beliefs and practices of patients, and (3) accommodating diverse healing practices. Construed as such, recognition of medical pluralism encourages pragmatic willingness to examine the personal and cultural meaning associated with CAM use, the biases and assumptions of biomedicine, as well as the risk-benefit ratio of CAM practices. In this way, recognition of medical pluralism can help clinicians enhance patient care in a manner consistent with basic ethical principles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17823467     DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.05.060205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  9 in total

1.  Practices, attitudes, and beliefs associated with complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among cancer patients.

Authors:  Kristen Arthur; Juan Carlos Belliard; Steven B Hardin; Kathryn Knecht; Chien-Shing Chen; Susanne Montgomery
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.279

2.  Patterns and implications of medical pluralism among HIV/AIDS patients in rural South Africa.

Authors:  M Moshabela; P Pronyk; N Williams; H Schneider; M Lurie
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2011-05

3.  Looking Back, Looking Forward: The Ethical Framing of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Oncology Over the Last 20 Years.

Authors:  Brittany C Kimball; Gail Geller; Rahma Warsame; Ashok Kumbamu; Aminah Jatoi; Barbara Koenig; Jon C Tilburt
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-03-09

4.  Toward Interdisciplinary Care: Bridging the Divide between Biomedical and Alternative Health Care Providers.

Authors:  William G Elder; Deborah L Crooks; Samuel C Matheny; Chester D Jennings
Journal:  Ann Behav Sci Med Educ       Date:  2008

5.  Patient-Planetary Health Co-benefit Prescribing: Emerging Considerations for Health Policy and Health Professional Practice.

Authors:  Nicole Redvers
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-04-30

6.  Strategies to integrate community-based traditional and complementary healthcare systems into mainstream HIV prevention programs in resource-limited settings.

Authors:  Subash Thapa; Arja R Aro
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.185

7.  Disclosure of complementary medicine use to medical providers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  H Foley; A Steel; H Cramer; J Wardle; J Adams
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Disclosure of conventional and complementary medicine use to medical doctors and complementary medicine practitioners: A survey of rates and reasons amongst those with chronic conditions.

Authors:  Hope Foley; Amie Steel; Erica McIntyre; Joanna Harnett; David Sibbritt; Jon Adams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Additional treatment with mistletoe extracts for patients with breast cancer compared to conventional cancer therapy alone - efficacy and safety, costs and cost-effectiveness, patients and social aspects, and ethical assessment.

Authors:  Petra Schnell-Inderst; Caroline Steigenberger; Marcel Mertz; Ilvie Otto; Magdalena Flatscher-Thöni; Uwe Siebert
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2022-07-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.