Literature DB >> 17823104

End-of-procedure cefazolin concentrations after administration for prevention of surgical-site infection.

Erin Koopman1, David E Nix, Brian L Erstad, Michael J Demeure, Melinda M Hayes, John T Ruth, Kathryn R Matthias.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The adequacy of end-of-procedure free cefazolin concentrations after administration for the prevention of surgical-site infection (SSI) and compliance with national guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis for SSI were assessed.
METHODS: Patients undergoing elective surgery and receiving cefazolin for perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis were prospectively enrolled. Antibiotic administration was controlled by the surgeon and usage was recorded. For each patient, a single blood sample for cefazolin serum free and total concentrations was obtained within 15 minutes of wound closure. A free serum concentration threshold of 4 microg/mL was arbitrarily chosen based on the minimum inhibitory concentration required to inhibit 90% of strains of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli.
RESULTS: Fifty-seven subjects were enrolled, and noncompliance with published guidelines was observed for 26% of patients. Forty-six subjects had serum samples available for assay, 21.7% of whom had end-of-procedure free cefazolin concentrations of <4 microg/mL. Results of multivariate regression and population pharmacokinetic analysis revealed the importance of age and lean body weight in cefazolin clearance. Younger and taller patients had a greater risk of achieving below-threshold end-of-procedure concentrations. Of the patients for whom published guidelines were not followed, 67% had end-of-procedure free cefazolin concentrations below the threshold concentration (4 microg/mL). In contrast, less than 15% of cases where SSI prophylaxis complied with the published guidelines had below-threshold concentrations at the end of surgery.
CONCLUSION: Noncompliance with antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines was associated with low end-of-procedure antibiotic levels. Compliance with guidelines did not guarantee adequate levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17823104     DOI: 10.2146/ajhp070047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  5 in total

1.  Cefoxitin Plasma and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Concentration in Patients Undergoing Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Luigi Brunetti; Leonid Kagan; Glenn Forrester; Lauren M Aleksunes; Hongxia Lin; Steven Buyske; Ronald G Nahass
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.393

2.  Adherence to perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis among orthopedic trauma patients.

Authors:  Kristopher M Lundine; Susan Nelson; Richard Buckley; Sven Putnis; Paul J Duffy
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Applying surgical antimicrobial standards in cesarean deliveries.

Authors:  Kathryn E Fay; Lynn Yee
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Assessment of prophylactic antibiotic use in patients with surgical site infections.

Authors:  Whitney J Goede; Jenna K Lovely; Rodney L Thompson; Robert R Cima
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2013-07

5.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in bariatric surgery with continuous infusion of cefazolin: determination of concentration in adipose tissue.

Authors:  Rafael Anlicoara; Álvaro A B Ferraz; Kilma da P Coelho; José L de Lima Filho; Luciana T Siqueira; José G C de Araújo; Josemberg M Campos; Edmundo M Ferraz
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.129

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.