Literature DB >> 17823027

Patient reported activity after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Diane L Dahm1, Sunni A Barnes, Jeffrey R Harrington, Daniel J Berry.   

Abstract

A total of 335 patients underwent revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between 1995 and 2000 with a single implant design. These patients were surveyed regarding clinical outcome and activity level; 206 patients responded (62%). Average age at revision TKA was 69 years (range, 31-87 years). Average follow-up was 5.6 years (range, 3-9 years). Average University of California at Los Angeles activity level rating was 6.7 (range, 2-10). Satisfaction with activity level after TKA was 77%. Among the respondents, 126 (61%) indicated that their activities were limited by other joints. Patients younger than 70 years had higher University of California at Los Angeles activity level scores (P=.054) and Knee Society function scores (P < .001), but there was no difference in self-assessment of activity level vs peers (P = .81) compared to those older than 70 years. Patients most commonly reported participating in walking, stationary biking, swimming, and dancing. Twenty-three (12%) patients reported participating in heavy manual labor or sports deemed "not recommended" by Knee Society published guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17823027     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  6 in total

1.  Predisposing factors which are relevant for the clinical outcome after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Francois Hardeman; Jürgen Londers; Alexander Favril; Erik Witvrouw; Johan Bellemans; Jan Victor
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Patient-reported outcome correlates with knee function after a single-design mobile-bearing TKA.

Authors:  Jean-Noel Argenson; Sebastien Parratte; Abdullah Ashour; Richard D Komistek; Giles R Scuderi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  How long do revised and multiply revised knee replacements last? An analysis of the National Joint Registry.

Authors:  Kevin Deere; Michael R Whitehouse; Setor K Kunutsor; Adrian Sayers; Andrew J Price; James Mason; Ashley W Blom
Journal:  Lancet Rheumatol       Date:  2021-04-29

4.  Physical activity after total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Laura A Vogel; Giuseppe Carotenuto; John J Basti; William N Levine
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 5.  Patient-reported outcome measures following revision knee replacement: a review of PROM instrument utilisation and measurement properties using the COSMIN checklist.

Authors:  Shiraz A Sabah; Elizabeth A Hedge; Simon G F Abram; Abtin Alvand; Andrew J Price; Sally Hopewell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Total knee arthroplasty in young patients: Factors predictive of aseptic failure in the 2nd-4th decade.

Authors:  Tristan Camus; William J Long
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-11-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.