Literature DB >> 17823019

Cemented total knee arthroplasty using a modern prosthesis in young patients with osteoarthritis.

Gavan P Duffy1, Amy R Crowder, Robert R Trousdale, Daniel J Berry.   

Abstract

Fifty-two consecutive cemented total knee arthroplasties were performed using the Press-Fit Condylar (DePuy, Warsaw, Ind) knee system on patients aged 55 years or younger at Mayo Clinic Rochester from 1988 to 1994. Patients were followed for a minimum of 10 years, with an average follow-up of 12 years (range, 10-15 years). There were 8 total revisions (15%), including 2 revisions before 10 years, one for sepsis at 1 year, and one for instability at 8 years. Six revisions occurred between 10 and 15 years, all associated with polyethylene wear and osteolysis. Implant survival rate was estimated to be 96% at 10 years and 85% at 15 years of follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17823019     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  20 in total

Review 1.  What is the evidence for total knee arthroplasty in young patients?: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  James A Keeney; Selena Eunice; Gail Pashos; Rick W Wright; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Similar survival between screw cementless and cemented tibial components in young patients with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla; Francisco A Miralles-Muñoz; Fernando A Lopez-Prats
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Arthroplasty in young adults: options, techniques, trends, and results.

Authors:  Bharat S Mody; Kshitij Mody
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-06

4.  Management of knee osteoarthritis in primary care.

Authors:  Hui Shan Sim; Ke Xin Magneline Ang; Choon How How; Sir Young James Loh
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 5.  No difference between cemented and cementless total knee arthroplasty in young patients: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Edoardo Franceschetti; Guglielmo Torre; Alessio Palumbo; Rocco Papalia; Jón Karlsson; Olufemi R Ayeni; Kristian Samuelsson; Francesco Franceschi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Trabecular metal in total knee arthroplasty associated with higher knee scores: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mariano Fernandez-Fairen; Daniel Hernández-Vaquero; Antonio Murcia; Ana Torres; Rafael Llopis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Long-term results of total knee arthroplasty in haemophilic patients: an 18-year follow-up.

Authors:  Lukas Ernstbrunner; Andreas Hingsammer; Sabrina Catanzaro; Reto Sutter; Brigit Brand; Karl Wieser; Sandro F Fucentese
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Wear and lysis is the problem in modular TKA in the young OA patient at 10 years.

Authors:  Andrew N Odland; John J Callaghan; Steve S Liu; Christopher W Wells
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Preoperative tibial mechanical axis orientation and articular surface design influence on the coronal joint line orientation relative to the ground during gait after total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Koji Murakami; Satoshi Hamai; Ken Okazaki; Satoru Ikebe; Hidehiko Higaki; Takeshi Shimoto; Yasuharu Nakashima
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Cementless and cemented total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than fifty five years. Which is better?

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Jang-Won Park; Hyung-Mook Lim; Eun-Soo Park
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.